Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: juzcuz
No. She bit her nails.
486 posted on 07/26/2002 7:06:48 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies ]


To: Politicalmom
Forgot about that - Brenda did say that she bit her nails. She probably couldn't leave scratches like that.
488 posted on 07/26/2002 7:09:39 PM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies ]

To: Politicalmom
What about the unidentified DNA and blue paint then, is that a hoax? I thought I rembered testimony about fingernail stuff. My brain must be going......going, gone.
489 posted on 07/26/2002 7:10:33 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies ]

To: Politicalmom
She had to have some nails --

LE found fibers under her nails. I wonder how much nail she had. Of course I'll/we'll never know that. Nevertheless, if the marks on DW's arm was caused by finger nails, they would have had to be a good length- to dig out skin. Also, no DNA from DW was found under her nails no matter what length. I'm just (mentally) chewing through this one detail of (the arm marks) that bothered me.
498 posted on 07/26/2002 7:20:03 PM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson