Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Politicalmom
She had to have some nails --

LE found fibers under her nails. I wonder how much nail she had. Of course I'll/we'll never know that. Nevertheless, if the marks on DW's arm was caused by finger nails, they would have had to be a good length- to dig out skin. Also, no DNA from DW was found under her nails no matter what length. I'm just (mentally) chewing through this one detail of (the arm marks) that bothered me.
498 posted on 07/26/2002 7:20:03 PM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies ]


To: juzcuz
It could be that any trace evidence was destroyed by the environment she was left in. Some evidence was just lost by her condition. So evidence may have existed and been lost naturally (they had to cut off her whole nail to do the scraping). Nicole Simpson's nails didn't have OJ's DNA and I remember at that trial the specialists explained you really have to dig.
510 posted on 07/26/2002 7:45:42 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson