To: spectre
I thought about fingers gripping on the skin surface as well. However, if I remember right, the thumb placement (implication) in the photo is not normal to a gripping thumb, which would go out from the other fingers.. The arc on DW's forearm skin did not look to me like a gripping right/left hand or a gripping bite. I thought about being stuck in the sand the with motorhome, etc. I'm not familiar with mechanics and how such skin scars can happen from equipment, etc.. -So I wondered about that-
362 posted on
07/26/2002 12:04:56 PM PDT by
juzcuz
To: juzcuz
Thru out this whole case, the one thing we can be absolutely CERTAIN of, is these marks on DW's arm that were photographed, amounted to
nothing to do with Danielle or they would have used it against him.
sw
365 posted on
07/26/2002 12:08:26 PM PDT by
spectre
To: juzcuz; All
I have seen my own husband come in from doing the yard work, after moving branches and taking the bags off of his riding lawn mower, with what could easily look like scratches, or bites. (I can vouch for him)..Anyway, digging out of the sand was frustrating and difficult.
For any skeptic out there, that this evidence was GOOD and not used in court, because it was too prejudicial to DW...I can only laugh at the suggestion.
sw
369 posted on
07/26/2002 12:18:47 PM PDT by
spectre
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson