I have seen my own husband come in from doing the yard work, after moving branches and taking the bags off of his riding lawn mower, with what could easily look like scratches, or bites. (I can vouch for him)..Anyway, digging out of the sand was frustrating and difficult.
For any skeptic out there, that this evidence was GOOD and not used in court, because it was too prejudicial to DW...I can only laugh at the suggestion.
sw
All evidence is "prejudical" against the defendant right? I would think the scratches were considered not to be evidence by the judge if he didn't allow it.