Skip to comments.
Geology Picture of the Week, June 23-30, 2002
NASA Earth Observatory ^
 | 06/26/2002
Posted on 06/26/2002 8:56:25 AM PDT by cogitator
 Richat Structure, Mauritania
 

 
This prominent circular feature in the Sahara desert of Mauritania has attracted attention since the earliest space missions because it forms a conspicuous bulls-eye in the otherwise rather featureless expanse of the desert. Described by some as looking like an outsized ammonite in the desert, the structure [which has a diameter of almost 50 kilometers (30 miles)] has become a landmark for shuttle crews. Initially interpreted as a meteorite impact structure because of its high degree of circularity, it is now thought to be merely a symmetrical uplift (circular anticline) that has been laid bare by erosion. Paleozoic quartzites form the resistant beds outlining the structure. 
 
This image was acquired on October 7, 2000 by the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) on NASAs Terra satellite. With its 14 spectral bands from the visible to the thermal infrared wavelength region, and its high spatial resolution of 15 to 90 meters (about 50 to 300 feet), ASTER will image Earth for the next 6 years to map and monitor the changing surface of our planet.
TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Outdoors; Science
KEYWORDS: anticline; geology; mauritania; quartzite; richatstructure; sahara; saharadesert
    I was having trouble finding a good picture this week until this one showed up today. I wanted to find "geological" pictures of the Iran quake, but it sometimes takes weeks for any pictures of actual ground disruption from quakes to appear.
1
posted on 
06/26/2002 8:56:26 AM PDT
by 
cogitator
 
To: kayak; Miss Marple; CPT Clay; capitan_refugio; SuziQ; GingisK; Lazarus Long; d4now; Cuttnhorse; ...
    *ping*
2
posted on 
06/26/2002 8:57:52 AM PDT
by 
cogitator
 
To: cogitator
    Forgot to mention some nice new Kilauea lava flow shots at the link below. Make sure you scroll all the way down the page. 
Eruption Update
 
3
posted on 
06/26/2002 9:06:21 AM PDT
by 
cogitator
 
To: cogitator
    The concentricity of the uplifted strata is amazingly symmetrical. This suggests to me that there has been a uniform balance of platonic uplift vs. erosion over millennia. 
 Thanks for a great post. 
 Barnacle, P.G.
 
4
posted on 
06/26/2002 10:09:41 AM PDT
by 
Barnacle
 
To: Barnacle
    "platonic uplift"= tectonic uplift?
5
posted on 
06/26/2002 11:48:49 AM PDT
by 
slouper
 
To: slouper
    "platonic uplift"= tectonic uplift?I hope it wasn't a platonic uplift, I've had too many relationships like that. :D Actually, it might be a plutonic uplift, cxcept they usually don't go in such perfect circles. The Rocky Mtns. are an example of uncovered batholiths, wannabe volcanoes that stopped at depth, and were caused by plutonic activity. Personally, I think it looks like the world's biggest flying saucer finding. (Grin)
 
6
posted on 
06/26/2002 2:01:18 PM PDT
by 
xJones
 
To: slouper
    "platonic uplift"= tectonic uplift?
...or maybe a Teutonic Uplift.
7
posted on 
06/26/2002 2:12:43 PM PDT
by 
Redcloak
 
To: slouper; xJones
    PLUTONIC uplift. 
 Oh, the dangers of relying on spellcheck! ;^)
 
8
posted on 
06/26/2002 6:59:08 PM PDT
by 
Barnacle
 
To: Barnacle
    Hey, I mistyped "cxcept" in my post to you. :)
I've taken a lot of geology classes and we always had jokes about "plutonic" relationships. And the old classic joke was: "You take me for granite, treat me like schist, and that isn't gneiss. [Answer] No I don't, but dolamite." Geologist jokes aren't the world's best. {grin)
 
9
posted on 
06/26/2002 10:05:49 PM PDT
by 
xJones
 
To: cogitator
    Wow.  Very cool.  Thanks!
10
posted on 
06/27/2002 5:43:57 AM PDT
by 
d4now
 
To: xJones
    What, you don't like looking for perfect cleavage?
To: xJones
    I think every geology student believes he coined those jokes. 
 But, actually I did. &;^) 
 The real difference between plutonic and platonic is that there's no uplift associated with platonic. (chuckle)
 
12
posted on 
06/27/2002 8:16:00 AM PDT
by 
Barnacle
 
To: xJones
    And remember folks, "Subduction leads to orogeny".
13
posted on 
06/27/2002 8:19:48 AM PDT
by 
Barnacle
 
To: cogitator
    Thanks!!!
14
posted on 
06/27/2002 9:14:34 AM PDT
by 
CPT Clay
 
To: cogitator
    You sure it's not a closeup of a fossilized snail?
16
posted on 
09/18/2018 1:16:22 AM PDT
by 
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
 
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson