To: ValerieUSA
I never said it was a victimless crime.
To: sweetliberty
I know you didn't -- but I see some people on FR poo-poo the notion that porn is dangerous. Like they say Westerfield can't be guilty because he's never committed a crime before, and the child porn on his computer doesn't mean anything regarding Danielle's murder. I had just posted that on a thread about that case and copy/pasted it here because I think it might apply to Elizabeth Smart's abduction, too.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson