Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good-Bye Cruel Free Republic
6-16-02 | wasfree

Posted on 06/16/2002 5:32:24 AM PDT by magnum opus dejure

Well, it's been 4 years since I first found Free Republic. I have always felt like I belonged here and have really enjoyed the banter back and forth between us members. I am afraid all this is now over. I am really suprised and shocked at it's suddenness. Before I leave I want to thank a freeper from Michigan who sent me a DVD player last year to give to my kids for Christmas. You reaffirmed my faith in humanity.

I know this thread will be deleted before many people get to read it, but I just can't go without saying a final word. Every since 911 the 'vibe' here at FR has been decidedly hostile. I guess it was a matter of time before the newbie moderator got around to weeding me out for my sometimes unpopular views. So I join the ranks of A+Bert and so many others who gave FR a interesting flavor. I will miss coming here 20 times a day and keeping up on things. But without posting priviledges there is just no point. I must go find another conservative group to try to be a part of.

In the future, when a freeper who has been a loyal member since August 1998 crosses the line, how about a note instead of banning? Would that have been too much? I may have gotten out of line, how is beyond me, but if such a tresspass would have been pointed out I would gladly have refrained from doing so again. It is just not right to just ban an account with no explaination. Especially when the freeper has been here 4 years. I have no idea what I am going to do with my days now that I no longer have FR. Well, I guess I have said my part. It is a sad day when one has to leave family and friends. I feel like some of you were just that. But apparently I am no longer wanted around here. I bid my good day to you all and hope that karma pays it's respects to those who do injustice.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: opuslist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,401-1,420 next last
To: IronJack
Perhaps the best rendering for this fellow's nom de plume is "Greatest piece of work" ...
221 posted on 06/16/2002 10:01:55 AM PDT by mikrofon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jwfiv
Kind of you to say. Thank you.
222 posted on 06/16/2002 10:03:30 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
A freepmail to the Admin or Sidebar Moderator account can also work. We can do all sorts of wildcard searches.
223 posted on 06/16/2002 10:04:45 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Hard to tell. I do know that he had posted very little since 2000 (we don't have statistics before then). Pretty much in the last month he had more than doubled his entire output from 2000 through to 2002. I did a google search and didn't find anything older, either.

All of the examples I gave above were in the past few days.

Was he just a troubled guy who lost it? Maybe. But we do have some disruptors who literally have dozens of accounts from 1998 or 2000 or 2001 laying around aging, and when one gets banned they start using another. He may have been in that category. No real way to tell. What I do know is that people who think that way should find another online home.

224 posted on 06/16/2002 10:08:45 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: *Opus List
223 posts and no one goes to the trouble of doing what I just did? I'm sorry I even started that list.
225 posted on 06/16/2002 10:09:48 AM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: MileHi
No, freepmail can't be used when banned or suspended any longer. We had some problems with that, so John changed the software.

When you sign up, you get a confirmation mail from Jim. If you get banned or suspended and disagree with it, you can mail him at that address using regular email.

226 posted on 06/16/2002 10:11:24 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: OkieGrit2; Jim Robinson
I wondered if you were the old Okiegrit or not. Thanks for clearing that up. Your okiegrit account was banned a long time ago. Long before there were moderators (and Jim didn't log back then reasons, since there was no one else to see).

Somehow, I doubt Jim banned you for the reasons you gave right there.

227 posted on 06/16/2002 10:15:25 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
A while back I posted some childish things about the government and a day or 2 after that I had a military helicopter circle my house about 10 times at about 100ft. It even had a loaded rocket launcher and the guy in the window was staring directly at me. Then a couple months ago a cessna did some really strange tricks right over my house

OH my goodness! Does this person know that paranoia is a treatable illness? Someone should get this person to a doctor ASAP. UMMM... make sure it isn't a female doctor or anyone of color. On second thought...........he he he he he.

The other day I posted something about our government too. The F-18's were flying all over my house. Oh wait. They do that once a month, I live near a base. Never mind. Hey, where's my FR T-shirt? And where can I buy one?

228 posted on 06/16/2002 10:18:22 AM PDT by Teacup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GeekDejure
Thanks.
Yes, of course "dejure". Actually, I was kidding the departing opus-writer with the "du jour".
And I have spent my time in Black's Law Dictionary.
My login name reflects my study of both law and astronomy. (Edwin Hubble studied both...an odd mix).
229 posted on 06/16/2002 10:18:26 AM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Maybe the best solution would be to have a easily accessable list of "banned posters".

I got a better idea. Have a mirror forum comprised of nothing but banned FReepers where they could all go at each other. JimRob could then charge admission to the site for non-banned FReepers and voila....we'd probably never have to have another fundraiser around this place again.

230 posted on 06/16/2002 10:20:24 AM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
But we do have some disruptors who literally have dozens of accounts from 1998 or 2000 or 2001 laying around aging, and when one gets banned they start using another.

Has Jim considered "aging off" old accounts so they can't be used in this way as sleeper accounts? Automatically nuke accounts after X amount of time (and X could be a year or more). IMO, anyone who selects a screen name then doesn't use it for a year or more is simply trying to place a "back door" into the system, and should be discouraged from doing so.

231 posted on 06/16/2002 10:20:34 AM PDT by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Gramps
are you a grumpy old man irl? :)
232 posted on 06/16/2002 10:20:53 AM PDT by Windsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Please Don't Make Me Use The Cat ..
We Are Almost there ...
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


Thank you Registered!
STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

233 posted on 06/16/2002 10:21:22 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
And another thing ... ;)

Having worked as a moderator for a major network news chat site in the past, abusers often open 10 or more accounts at a time using the same IP, which is a red flag for trouble. Why not "smarten up" the software so it records when this happens, then follow up with the abuse coordinator at that particular IP when/if disruptive posts spew from those abused accounts?

234 posted on 06/16/2002 10:24:06 AM PDT by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
BTW,doesnt't Bubba-2 look just DREAMY in his new sombrero?

That just shows you never saw the pic of him sweatin' in that t-shirt while he was choppin' wood!

Whoops! I said t-shirt! hope that ain't a bannin offence!

235 posted on 06/16/2002 10:24:21 AM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: adversarial
Mostly ignored. That is one of the problems (if it can be called that) with the newer software that allows one to see the replies to one in the self-search. The full threads get loaded less frequently because of it, and individual comments tend to go unnoticed except by those who the comment was specifically made to.

Here, go and check. You won't see his posts, but in each of these, no one hit abuse. They stayed up on the forum until about 4 hours after he was banned (that is how long it took until Jim woke up for the day and decided to nuke). These are the comments I mentioned above.

Post 31 was his

Post 29 was his

Post 33 was his

Post 10 was his

That's enough for now. As I was compiling this for you, I noticed something. Nearly all of his replies were made to either himself (so only he would see it unless the thread was loaded) and to JohnHuang2 (who gets so many replies that there is no way he could see them all).

236 posted on 06/16/2002 10:28:45 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

Comment #237 Removed by Moderator

To: hole_n_one
Sure. Older means older by time (although that is subject to change in the next software version). I don't want to give the exact timeframe, because experience has shown that if we do that, then we will have a ton of accounts wait that long before doing anything.

Beyond the software restriction, Jim prefers to handle the banning or nuking of "established" freepers himself. What makes for established? Time and involvement. Would this "wasfree" person have qualified? I say no (which is what I did the ban, asking Jim to look and nuke if he felt appropriate). He was established by time, but by the counters here I can see how much posting he had done, and it wasn't much until the past month. And being a long timer with a good memory, I don't remember him from before the counters went into place back in 2000.

238 posted on 06/16/2002 10:33:51 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Yeah, well, as many here seem to forget, there is a fine line between political OPINION and political slander and flamming. Like Grandma always said, if you don't have anything nice to say, then don't say anything at all. Otherwise, be prepared b!tch-slapped by any and all.
239 posted on 06/16/2002 10:34:37 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: magnum opus dejure
I really don't know what you did. I haven't seen many, if any, of your posts.
240 posted on 06/16/2002 10:35:57 AM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,401-1,420 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson