Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lampson Bill Will Restore Vision to NASA's Human Spaceflight Program
Spaceref ^ | 5/15/02 | Bill Lampson

Posted on 05/16/2002 6:37:50 AM PDT by Brett66

Lampson Bill Will Restore Vision to NASA's Human Spaceflight Program

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Today, U.S. Rep. Nick Lampson announced that he was introducing legislation to provide a vision and a concrete set of goals for the nation's human space flight program after the International Space Station. "America's human space flight program is adrift, with no clear vision or commitment to any goals after the completion of the International Space Station. The Space Exploration Act of 2002 sets forth specific incremental goals that are challenging, exciting and that build capabilities and infrastructure needed for an ultimate human mission to Mars," said Lampson.

The bill establishes an implementation framework that will allow the best, most innovative mission concepts to compete. It is an approach similar to that of the highly successful and innovative Discovery program in NASA's space science enterprise. In addition, the implementation approach contains tough requirements for periodic independent cost and program reviews to ensure that the exploration initiative is carried out in as cost-efficient and effective a manner as possible.

"The real obstacle we face in overcoming the drift in the nation's human space flight program is not technological and it's not financial - it's the lack of commitment to get started. We don't need another national commission to come up with goals for human space flight beyond low Earth orbit," Lampson said. "What we need is a national commitment to carry out any one of the many worthy goals that have been articulated to date."

"Once America gets started on achieving the first of the human spaceflight goals listed in the bill, we have gotten over the highest hurdles, success in the entire initiative," said Lampson. "We will once again be moving outward beyond low Earth orbit. And in the process, we will revitalize our space program, energize our industrial and academic needs, create new opportunities for international cooperation, and inspire our young people."

A fact sheet on The Space Exploration Act of 2002 follows.

Space Exploration Act of 2002

Fact Sheet

Requires the NASA Administrator to set the following goals for the future activities of NASA's human spaceflight program:

  1. Within 8 years of enactment, the development and flight demonstration of a reusable space vehicle capable of carrying humans from low earth orbit to the L 1 and L 2 Earth-Sun libration points and back, to the Earth-Moon libration points and back, and to lunar orbit and back.

  2. Within 10 years of enactment, the development and flight demonstration of a reusable space vehicle capable of carrying humans from low Earth orbit to and from an Earth-orbit crossing asteroid and rendezvousing with it.

  3. Within 15 years of enactment, the development and flight demonstration of a reusable space vehicle capable of carrying humans from lunar orbit to the surface of the Moon and back, as well as the deployment of a human-tended habitation and research facility on the lunar surface.

  4. Within 20 years of enactment, the development and flight demonstration of a reusable space vehicle capable of carrying humans to and from Martian orbit, the deployment of a human tended habitation and research facility on the surface of a Martian moon, and the development and flight demonstration of a reusable space vehicle capable of carrying humans from Martian orbit to the surface of Mars and back.

The bill establishes an Office of Exploration within NASA, headed by an Associate Administrator, which will be responsible for planning, budgeting, and managing activities undertaken to accomplish the above goals.

The Administrator will be required to establish a process for conducting competitions for innovative, cost-effective mission concepts to accomplish the above goals, which will be open to industry, academia, nongovernmental research organizations, NASA Centers, and other governmental organizations.

International participation and cost sharing will be encouraged. The Administrator will be required to establish an independent panel to conduct a merit-based competitive review of the proposals submitted and an independent external review of the cost estimate and funding profile of the competitively selected proposals. These findings must be reported to Congress.

The implementation plans of the competitively selected proposals must be updated every year by the manager of the project and the Administrator must have an independent external review panel review each of the updated implementation plans and report these findings to Congress.

The bill authorizes $50 million for FY 2003 and $200 million for FY 2004.

CONTACT: Khristyn Brimmeier

OFFICE: (202)225-6565


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: mars; moon; nasa; space
Interesting, isn't it the presidents job to do this?
1 posted on 05/16/2002 6:37:51 AM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale;gcruse;anymouse;RadioAstronomer;NonZeroSum;Cincinatus’ Wife;Cincinatus; Jimkress...
Ping. Because noone will see it if it's not posted in News/Activism. ;)
2 posted on 05/16/2002 6:39:14 AM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Got to run for now, but here's a bump for later reading. Thanks for the ping.
3 posted on 05/16/2002 6:41:37 AM PDT by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
As we learned in July, 1989, the simple declaration of exploration goals is not sufficient to ensure that they are pursued -- Bush-41 announced a "Moon-Mars Initiative" on the steps of the National Air and Space Museum, but it went nowhere. Congress refused to fund it two years in a row and the "Office of Exploration" (yes, it did exist between 1991 and 1994 -- largely in the form described in this article) went quietly into that good night.

Cynically viewed, this is a desperate effort on Lampson's part to preserve as much of the JSC infrastructure as possible (most of JSC is in Texas-9; part of the surround area is in Tom Delay's (Texas-22) district.) Unless the administration signs on to this, it will go nowhere.

4 posted on 05/16/2002 6:46:43 AM PDT by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
Cynically viewed, this is a desperate effort on Lampson's part to preserve as much of the JSC infrastructure as possible

I thought there was some ulterior motive, this explains what his motivations are. Guess that makes me a cynic. :)

5 posted on 05/16/2002 6:49:51 AM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Robinson
If I do a search for "NASA" this article doesn't show up in the search. If I do a search of "NASA's" it shows up, is the search feature supposed to be that selective?
6 posted on 05/16/2002 6:56:51 AM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
..."and I am the Queen of Romania."
--Dorothy Parker
7 posted on 05/16/2002 7:09:10 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
I live in Lampson's district, so I will confirm that your cynicism is justified.

Unless the public (read Congress) is willing provide the funds, this is an exercise in futility. Furthermore, given past performance, I'm not convinced that NASA deserves the opportunity. Perhaps a public/private joint venture Mars Exploration Consortium independent of NASA would be a better route.

Regardless, this bill is going nowhere. Lampson just needs the reelection issue to gain support from the local space industry voters.

8 posted on 05/16/2002 8:59:55 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
I like rockets as much as the next guy, but........

I really don't see the need to keep wasting money on the useless "space program".

You can't even buy "space food sticks" anymore, and I hate "Tang"

9 posted on 05/16/2002 9:19:14 AM PDT by WhiteGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66;gcruse;anymouse;RadioAstronomer;NonZeroSum;Cincinatus’ Wife;Cincinatus;Jimkress
Related
10 posted on 05/16/2002 9:21:15 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
You can't even buy "space food sticks" anymore, and I hate "Tang"

Tang hates you, and All Your Food Sticks Are Belong to Us.

11 posted on 05/17/2002 7:40:34 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson