Ah, yeah!
That's why I watch women's beach volleyball! 8^)
Posted on 05/14/2002 9:07:47 AM PDT by LavaDog
We've all heard that "breast is best" when it comes to feeding infants. But does the entire village have to share in the process?
Recently I was doing what I usually do with four young kids: Trying to keep from drinking until at least 4:00 in the afternoon. Part of that routine included getting the five-year-old to gymnastics class — with the three-year-old and the ten-month old in tow. Usually it's quite the mob scene. Moms and kids everywhere in a huge portion of the gymnastics floor loosely called the "entryway."
That day I had to do a double take.
Sitting right in the middle of all the kiddy and other traffic was an attractive thirty-something mom — with her shirt just about up to her neck and with no discernable undergarments, meaning, yes, she was bare-breasted, feeding her not-so-young child, probably about 14-months old. Let's be clear. She was leaning back on both hands, essentially thrusting out her chest, while the little guy held her completely exposed breast and sucked away, while she casually held a conversation with another mom. (I've probably already been a little too graphic for some my male readers. Chill out.)
I decided I had to say something. Now I've read there's a chemical in the brain that controls inhibition and that it sort of dissolves as one gets older. If that's the case then I expect to be truly dangerous by the time I'm 40. In any event, with my baby on my hip, holding another by the hand and the five-year-old following, I said "Is it too much to ask for you to cover up just a bit? If my eight-year-old son were here right now (never mind my hubby) I would be very uncomfortable." She looked at me as if I had not spoken English. I said, "I guess it would be too much to ask. " Major sigh.
This breastfeeding mom may have been one of the most blatant I've observed, but the fact remains that I've seen more breasts in my adult life thanks to mothers feeding babies than I ever did in a high-school locker room.
But breastfeeding in public does not have to mean publicly exposing one's breast. I've breastfed my four children, and on occasion when they were newborns and eating every hour or two I've even done so in certain public places where I knew I could be so discreet that no one would/could know. Very soon, of course, babies are — or should be — going hours between feedings. So, why can't a mother either arrange her outings around the feeding schedule of her little one, or at least take the simplest measures to be discreet when she doesn't?
But I've found that to even suggest that breastfeeding moms practice such thoughtfulness or self-restraint is considered scandalous in activist circles. (Never mind that I schedule around my four children all the time. For instance I might avoid adult-oriented restaurants or too many errands because it wouldn't be fair to the either kids or the other folks around them.)
Common courtesy, R.I.P.
I know this because having written a lengthier syndicated column on this very subject recently, I was bombarded by "hate mail" in response. But the biggest complaint by far was that I seemed to be a representative of some ancient civilization that viewed breasts as — gasp — sexual.
Well yeah, duh.
In some cultures, it may be that an enormous brass plate placed in a woman's stretched out lower lip is considered sexual, but in the West, it's breasts. (Whew.)
I asked several readers who wrote foaming, gasping e-mails to me, if they really don't view breasts as sexual then would they mind if I paraded half-naked in front of their husbands and sons? Okay, maybe the better idea would be somebody slightly better endowed parading in front of their husbands and sons, though I'm not sure that in the end it makes much difference and that just sort of reinforces the point.
Anyway, it does seem as if women who are adamant about public breastfeeding have another agenda in mind besides nourishing their infants. I mean why all the fuss over something that if done discreetly isn't even noticeable?
Because a woman's breasts are no longer just a part of her body, they are the ultimate political hot zone.
Breastfeeding advocates are actively pushing legislation in about 30 states that would enforce "breastfeeding anywhere anytime" laws. Many states, like California — no surprise — already have such legislation. And throughout the country, lawsuits over the public breast-feeding issue are rife. Guess who almost always wins?
In one case, the AP reported, a Hooters waitress had the gall to suggest she was "humiliated" to be told not to pump her breast milk by her superiors. (They didn't report it quite that way.) Don't get me started, except to point out that the idea that a Hooters waitress could be humiliated by anything is the definition of absurd.
But, it turns out she was on the cutting edge. Breastfeeding rights aren't good enough anymore. Today the golden ring is the right to PUMP anytime anywhere, though for now the emphasis is on the workplace with proposed federal legislation that, if its advocates have their way, will promise just that. Activists "claim" that women prefer to do this activity in private, but as they well know the reality is that that's hardly always possible. And nourishing for baby or not, you haven't seen unattractive until you have seen a woman "pumping." Been there, done that. In fact widespread viewing of this activity might be the one thing that really could desexualize breasts in our culture. (Hmmm. Could that be what the activists really want?)
In any event, I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that many a "pumping mom" is just trying to make up for her guilt over letting someone else take care of her baby for most of the day.
Still, the ongoing, informal survey I've conducted over the years suggests that while there may be a growing tendency toward "I am woman watch me breastfeed," there are a whole lot of hairdressers, cab drivers, "housewives," professional women, husbands (enlightened or otherwise) — you-name-it — who remain quite emphatic that it's not something for the neighborhood or the office to share.
But, just try explaining that in a culture where it has somehow become "Women's breasts uber alles."
Especially when considering this photo- none of these girls seem particularly well-endowed, and none of them appear much beyond high-school age...
Having a cute face and a luscious body are very nice things for a guy to look at... But I've recently determined that elegance, class and wisdom are equally sexy. And without these latter factors, you have a high-school girl- cute, but stupid and boring. Give me a lady any old day of the week- attractive, elegant and smart...
Ever wonder why I've never been to Hooters?
Be well...
Well, I heard they serve up some mean chicken wings :-)
We must each take individual responibility for the handling of such issues as they present themselves.
No. I'm saying it is a wonderful thing that should not be shared with the general public in a "matter-of-fact" manner.
Ah, yeah!
That's why I watch women's beach volleyball! 8^)
She's exactly right. Women who aren't being discrete are more interested in making a statement than they are in feeding the child.
Of course!
I particularly remember one of Oksana Baiul's routines in the Olympics a few years ago.
8^)
Oh, please. The issue is one of common courtesy and utter (sorry) disregard for the people around you.
Did you even read the article ?
Schedules can be arranged to accomodate feeding newborns and more appropriate methods are available for older infants. Breastfeeding a baby is a personal decision but one's personal decisions are often offensive to others. Suppose a houseguest made a personal decisions to relieve himself in your kitchen sink rather the bathroom ? Would that be acceptable, too ? Why not ? It's a natural bodily function that requires attention at inopportune times. A mother breastfeeding a baby in the seat next to me on a plane is as rude and inconsiderate as it is in restaurants or any number of other public places. An ounce of discretion and good manners goes a long, long way.
But sheesh! Isan't anyone teaching kids a more public, civil, educated vocabulary these days?
I mean if I'd wanted to live in a hogwallow, I'd have been born a democrat or . . . well, anyway.
The biological purpose of a woman's breasts is, after all, to feed her babies.
I have to disagree. Mammary glands take up but a small space within the breast of any primate. However, human females are the only primate female to have protruding breasts. If there were only one purpose for human female breasts, then evolution and the natural selection process would not have needed to select for that physical trait. The existing primate morphology would not needed to have been "improved" upon.
My guess is that human female breasts developed in response to humans learning to walk upright.
Considering who'd have to do the teaching, I'd say you expect far too much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.