[Texaggie79]

Dangit I keep forgetting

Click picture to enlarge.

[Physicist]

I can't tell you how many of these "free energy" devices have been advertised by the popular press over the years. It's been going on for centuries. Wake me when I can actually buy one commercially, and that has a credible money-back guarantee.

[Physicist]

But according to the new science of scalar electromagnetics, the MEG does not break the law of conservation of energy. It's just that the energy is conserved in the fourth dimension, time, and not our 3-space world.

What else could conservation possibly mean?

[jlogajan]

As I said before on another thread, Naudin is a beautiful craftsman. The details in his work are outstanding. However, this is pure bunk.

[Whitebread]

April Fools!

[T. P. Pole]

Not Aprils Fools. Just a normal fool. Posted a few days ago.

[spqrzilla9]

Patents aren't granted without significant proof that the product actually works as promised, and so getting one is in itself a coup, an undeniable mark of credibility for a new product.

False. Completely false. The Patent office does not require proof that an invention works. The granting of a patent is no validation of the utility of the device or process at all.

[Brett66]

I believe Joseph Nueman was the last person that recieved a lot of press from a free-energy device he developed. Nueman was a total fraud and he never attempted commercial production. This team seems to be more credible, but that's not saying much. I really want these guys to succeed though. The world will be fundamentally different in 20 years if it turns out to be true.