Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Cree
Tolkien draws an authoritative, absolute distinction between the pretty sprites of Shakespeare and popular fancy, and the Elves of true folklore.

That's very interesting, SC! I feel the same way about the Victorian idea of fluff angels versus the idea of the Biblical Angel. When anyone in the Bible is visited by an Angel, the Angel's first words are "fear not". To me, that means that the creature before them is not some sort of wispy, romantic thing, but a awesome, powerful being of whom they would be afraid!

23,154 posted on 09/02/2002 4:14:04 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23021 | View Replies ]


To: SuziQ
I don't like so much either the cutesy angels and cupids and stuff, though I think they at least predate the Victorian era.

But I've recently developed a liking for the Victorian era. It's sort of a fascinating time period, after the Civil War, before WWI.

It included the Wild West, and some great artwork, including the impressionists. Also, I guess, Tolkien was born during the Victorian era.

The whole thing was really not so long ago, it's easy to imagine it and how it was.

23,165 posted on 09/02/2002 4:41:19 PM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23154 | View Replies ]

To: SuziQ
To me, that means that the creature before them is not some sort of wispy, romantic thing, but a awesome, powerful being of whom they would be afraid!

My wife and I have discussed the same. The angels were God's messengers, not party girls.

At the same time, I have a feeling even the fluffy ones would have to say "fear not" if they just popped into the den...

23,181 posted on 09/02/2002 5:19:13 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson