Posted on 03/14/2002 5:07:26 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
This is a continuation of the infamous thread New Zealander Builds Hobbit Hole originally posted on January 26, 2001 by John Farson, who at the time undoubtedly thought he had found a rather obscure article that would elicit a few replies and die out. Without knowing it, he became the founder of the Hobbit Hole. For reasons incomprehensible to some, the thread grew to over 4100 replies. It became the place for hobbits and friends of hobbits to chit chat and share LoTR news and views, hang out, and talk amongst ourselves in the comfort of familiar surroundings.
In keeping with the new posting guidelines, the thread idea is continuing here, as will the Green Dragon Inn, our more structured spin-off thread, as soon as we figure out how to move all the good discussion that has been had there. As for the Hobbit Hole, we will just start fresh, bringing only a few mathoms such as the picture above with us to make it feel like home, and perhaps a walk down memory lane:
Our discussion has been light:
It very well may be that a thread named "New Zealander builds Hobbit hole" will end up being the longest Tolkien thread of them all, with some of the best heartfelt content... Sorry John, but I would have rather it had been one with a more distinguished title! post 252 - HairOfTheDog
However, I can still celebrate, with quiet dignity, the fact that what started as a laugh about some wacko in New Zealand has mutated and grown into a multifaceted discussion of the art, literature, and philosophy that is Tolkien. And now that I've managed to write the most pompous sentence of my entire life, I agree, Rosie post 506 - JenB
Hah! I was number 1000!! (Elvish victory dance... wait, no; that would be too flitty) post 1001 - BibChr
Real men don't have to be afraid of being flitty! Go for it. post 1011 HairOfTheDog
Seventeen years to research one mystical object seems a bit excessive post 1007 - JenB
Okay...who's the wise guy who didn't renew Gandalf's research grant? post 1024 Overtaxed
To the very philosophical:
Judas Iscariot obviously was a good man, or he wouldn't have been chosen to be one of the Apostles. He loved Jesus, like all of the Apostles, but he betrayed him. Yet without his betrayal, the Passion and Crucifixion would never have occurred, and mankind would not have been redeemed. So without his self-destruction infinite good would not have been accomplished. I certainly do not mean this to be irreverant but it seems to me that this describes the character of Gollum, in the scenes so movingly portrayed above Lucius Cornelius Sulla
To fun but heartfelt debates about the integrity and worth of some of the characters
Anyone else notice how Boromir treats the hobbits? He's very fond of them but he seems to think of them as children - ruffling Frodo's hair, calls them all 'little ones'. He likes them, but I don't think he really respects them post 1536 - JenB
Yes... Tolkien told us not to trust Boromir right off the bat when he began to laugh at Bilbo, until he realized that the Council obviously held this hobbit in high esteem. What a pompous dolt post 1538 - HairOfTheDog
I think almost every fault of his can be traced directly back to his blindness to anything spiritual or unseen. He considers the halflings as children, because that is what they look like. He considers the only hope of the ring to be in taking it and using it for a victory in the physical realm. He cannot see what the hobbits are truly made of, he cannot see the unseen hope of what the destruction of the ring might mean--the destruction of Sauron himself, and he cannot see the unseen danger that lies in the use of the ring itself I just feel sorry for Boromir--he is like a blind but honorable man, trying to take the right path on the road but missing the right path entirely because he simply cannot see it post 1548 - Penny1
Boromir isn't a jerk, he's a jock post 2401 Overtaxed
-----------------------------------------
Oh, I think by the time Frodo reaches the Cracks, he's not even himself anymore! I think he's not only on the brink of a dangerous place physically, he's on the brink of losing himself completely during the exchange with Gollum. But for some reason, the take-over isn't complete till he actually has to throw the Ring in. The person speaking to Gollum is not Frodo, but the "Wheel of Fire" that Sam sees. After the Ring is destroyed, Frodo not only comes back to himself, but comes back with the unbearable (to him) knowledge of what it's like to be completely without compassion. I think that's why it's so important to him to be compassionate in the Shire post 2506 - 2Jedismom
Regarding Frodo's compassion... it's a little too much at the end. Even Merry tells him that he's going to have to quit being so darn nice. But you're right. He's learned a lesson about evil that very few ever learn since it wasn't an external lesson but an internal one. (Those kinds of lessons have the greatest impact) Not only did he totally succumb to it, but he was rather ruthless to my little Smeagol post 2516 - carton253
Well that Frodo was a big mean bully! (to Smeagol) post 2519 Overtaxed
So as you can see, everything JRR Tolkien (and Peter Jackson) is welcome here in our New Row, our soon-to-be familiar New Hobbit Hole
; philosophy, opinion, good talk and frequent silliness.
Actually, that's a bad metaphor, since trying to turn the ship actually caused a great deal more damage than would have occured had they hit the iceberg head on. In fact, the Titanic probably wouldn't have sunk if they hadn't tried to turn her. But that's not important.
Here's what I said over there:
No. We really aren't. Our son is ADHD and we are very involved in all aspects of his school work and his school life. The majority of our school board members are committed Christians (and conservative Republicans). These are elected positions. Until last year's Governor's race, I was not represented by a single Democrat, from dog catcher on up to the White House. We are the most solid (or perhaps second most solid) Republican County in Virginia.And, most importantly, our parents are involved in the public schools.
I admire and applaud homeschoolers. But that's not what is best for our son.
Let me tell you a bit about the atmosphere here. I've shared this story elsewhere on FR. Last spring, two local high school boys (one from our church) were killed on their way to pick up another friend for a Young Life Bible Study. It had an incredible impact on the high school community. That Wednesday night, our youth group canceled their regular meeting (they have about 100-150 on a regular basis) and held a prayer and communion service. Over 1,200 kids showed up. Since the funeral, our youth group has added about another 100 senior high kids. And they are solidly supported by the community.
My son is 13, but he "gets it." He's preaparing to go on choir tour in two weeks and will sing at Ground Zero and Time Square. He has a shirt that he wears regularly to school that says "I want to be like Adam *****" (the boy from our church). I told him he couldn't wear it unless he was able to explain why. He can. And does.
In another community, we'd private school or homeschool in a heartbeat. But not here.
The main thing is continued parental involvement. We have that here. It may not always be that way. But for now, it is.
I think you homeschoolers are great. I also know that my wife's temperment and my son's temperment, when left together all day with the intent of teaching/learning, would land us on the nightly news or the Springer show.
Ironically, my wife will be teaching at a homeschool academy in the fall.
That is why I said: 'many states, and most center cities', which I think is accurate. As far as using too broad a brush, as I said earlier, I am fond of doing that. I have even said: 'Kill ALL the Orcs', which is, perhaps, too much of a generalization. LOL!
I have a business meeting tomorrow, for which I will have to be getting out of bed by about 3 AM your time, so I will be logging off soon.
Maybe I'm really naive, or too critical. I was in the local high school twice, for my PSAT and SATs. It was - well, to me it was a lot like visiting a prison. It felt so oppressive, enclosed and just wrong. I was already attending college, it wasn't the classrooms and halls that did it. There was an atmosphere there - this will sound silly - but it felt wrong. I can't understand how anyone could learn there. Sure, there are some kids I know who did learn, and they were the ones whose families were involved. Most parents just don't seem to care...
I agree that it is not hopeless, but would not put a child of mine in the inferior institutions that do exist. If I found that my child's school system was nearly as good as the one I went to, I likely would send my child there, if not, not.
Yes, that was a high quality broad brush, good for mixing in the good with the bad, which is the purpose of a good broad brush.
It's never too late to learn. I didn't learn German until I went to college. Does the college you're attending offer courses in Latin?
I just can't get over that Krispy Kreme Hooplah!
Oooohhhh, I was in love with Mr. Egabroad when I was in grade school! ;) Along with all the other girls in class, of course. He's a terrific teacher, and hopefully he's doing a good job as principle too...
When I was in Tumwater Schools, one of our church members was heavily involved in the school board. I think certainly in our case the involvement of people in the school board's decisions made a huge difference.
Oh, sorry... here's a northern night-light. Hope I got it posted before you logged off for the night!
I already explain a lot of words to him...based on my medical terminology.
Tonight, we were driving home from checking out Krispy Kreme and we drove by a weedy wheat field. He said "Would you look at those tares?"
Dan Quayle got in trouble for saying that once...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.