Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New Hobbit Hole

Posted on 03/14/2002 5:07:26 AM PST by HairOfTheDog

Welcome to The New Hobbit Hole

Concerning Hobbits

The New Hobbit Chronicles

This is a continuation of the infamous thread New Zealander Builds Hobbit Hole originally posted on January 26, 2001 by John Farson, who at the time undoubtedly thought he had found a rather obscure article that would elicit a few replies and die out. Without knowing it, he became the founder of the Hobbit Hole. For reasons incomprehensible to some, the thread grew to over 4100 replies. It became the place for hobbits and friends of hobbits to chit chat and share LoTR news and views, hang out, and talk amongst ourselves in the comfort of familiar surroundings.

In keeping with the new posting guidelines, the thread idea is continuing here, as will the Green Dragon Inn, our more structured spin-off thread, as soon as we figure out how to move all the good discussion that has been had there. As for the Hobbit Hole, we will just start fresh, bringing only a few mathoms such as the picture above with us to make it feel like home, and perhaps a walk down memory lane:

Our discussion has been light:

It very well may be that a thread named "New Zealander builds Hobbit hole" will end up being the longest Tolkien thread of them all, with some of the best heartfelt content... Sorry John, but I would have rather it had been one with a more distinguished title!… post 252 - HairOfTheDog

However, I can still celebrate, with quiet dignity, the fact that what started as a laugh about some wacko in New Zealand has mutated and grown into a multifaceted discussion of the art, literature, and philosophy that is Tolkien. And now that I've managed to write the most pompous sentence of my entire life, I agree, Rosie… post 506 - JenB

Hah! I was number 1000!! (Elvish victory dance... wait, no; that would be too flitty) … post 1001 - BibChr

Real men don't have to be afraid of being flitty! Go for it. – post 1011 – HairOfTheDog

Seventeen years to research one mystical object seems a bit excessive… post 1007 - JenB

Okay...who's the wise guy who didn't renew Gandalf's research grant?… post 1024 – Overtaxed

To the very philosophical:

…Judas Iscariot obviously was a good man, or he wouldn't have been chosen to be one of the Apostles. He loved Jesus, like all of the Apostles, but he betrayed him. Yet without his betrayal, the Passion and Crucifixion would never have occurred, and mankind would not have been redeemed. So without his self-destruction infinite good would not have been accomplished. I certainly do not mean this to be irreverant but it seems to me that this describes the character of Gollum, in the scenes so movingly portrayed above… Lucius Cornelius Sulla

To fun but heartfelt debates about the integrity and worth of some of the characters…

…Anyone else notice how Boromir treats the hobbits? He's very fond of them but he seems to think of them as children - ruffling Frodo's hair, calls them all 'little ones'. He likes them, but I don't think he really respects them… post 1536 - JenB

Yes... Tolkien told us not to trust Boromir right off the bat when he began to laugh at Bilbo, until he realized that the Council obviously held this hobbit in high esteem. What a pompous dolt… post 1538 - HairOfTheDog

…I think almost every fault of his can be traced directly back to his blindness to anything spiritual or unseen. He considers the halflings as children, because that is what they look like. He considers the only hope of the ring to be in taking it and using it for a victory in the physical realm. He cannot see what the hobbits are truly made of, he cannot see the unseen hope of what the destruction of the ring might mean--the destruction of Sauron himself, and he cannot see the unseen danger that lies in the use of the ring itself… I just feel sorry for Boromir--he is like a blind but honorable man, trying to take the right path on the road but missing the right path entirely because he simply cannot see it… post 1548 - Penny1

Boromir isn't a jerk, he's a jock… post 2401 – Overtaxed

-----------------------------------------

Oh, I think by the time Frodo reaches the Cracks, he's not even himself anymore! I think he's not only on the brink of a dangerous place physically, he's on the brink of losing himself completely during the exchange with Gollum. But for some reason, the take-over isn't complete till he actually has to throw the Ring in. The person speaking to Gollum is not Frodo, but the "Wheel of Fire" that Sam sees. After the Ring is destroyed, Frodo not only comes back to himself, but comes back with the unbearable (to him) knowledge of what it's like to be completely without compassion. I think that's why it's so important to him to be compassionate in the Shire… post 2506 - 2Jedismom

…Regarding Frodo's compassion... it's a little too much at the end. Even Merry tells him that he's going to have to quit being so darn nice. But you're right. He's learned a lesson about evil that very few ever learn since it wasn't an external lesson but an internal one. (Those kinds of lessons have the greatest impact) Not only did he totally succumb to it, but he was rather ruthless to my little Smeagol… post 2516 - carton253

Well that Frodo was a big mean bully! (to Smeagol)… post 2519 – Overtaxed

So as you can see, everything JRR Tolkien (and Peter Jackson) is welcome here in our New Row, our soon-to-be familiar New Hobbit Hole…; philosophy, opinion, good talk and frequent silliness.


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Chit/Chat; Poetry; TV/Movies; The Hobbit Hole
KEYWORDS: 2jmbombadil; allyourprecious; balroghotwings; bearspamandeggs; blowitoutyershorts; breecheese; buffdragons; cartonofspam; cherofthedog; closetsneakers; corinhonestsnaig; corinspamfunkle; corinspamhands; depraveddwarves; dwarfdeodorant; dwarfdiapers; dwarfgaloshes; dwarfkingcorinspam; dwarfspamwiches; dwarftossing; elffriends; elfspam; elvesruleforever; elvishfootfetish; emoryuniversity; endlesschitchat; foolofatook; frododigspipeweed; funklestormhands; fuzzycritters; giddygnadspam; girlyarmor; gnadbelchspam; gnaddwarfhunk; gnadspam; gnadthreadkiller; gollumthegreat; gondorianspamogram; goodbyeoldhole; greeneggsandspam; hobbitschmobbit; holediggingwomen; hotdogsmartypants; itcomesinpints; itsourhagspam; itsourspamnow; jenbneinerspam; jenmcsspam; keeblerelves; khazaddumdedumdum; ksenlovesspam; ksenshamelessspam; ksensneakspam; ksenspamaddict; latenightfunklators; lilspammer; lordoftherings; lordofthespam; lorenahobbit; menareweak; michaeldobbs; midgetporn; namariejensneak; nanowrimosneak; oblivionspam; orclust; otdefunklator; oversneakspamtax; pints; pippintook; pointyelfshoes; politerosespam; precious; preciousparty; preciousspam; rightwingpsychospam; rightwingspamsneak; rightwingsuperspam; rmdbreakfastspam; rmdlembasspam; rmdospam; rosiespamangel; ruthlesssnootyelves; rwrfannyspam; samwisethebrave; scottish; seamusspamfist; sissyelves; skivielessgondorian; smeagingsneakol; smeagolthesupreme; sneakingspam; sneakle; sneakping; sneakses; sneaktaxoverspam; snoots; snowpants; spameggssausagespam; spamfreesneaking; spamisnotprecious; spamminghair; squarehandspampants; stormsneakspamhands; stormspamsneakpants; superstarsmeagol; teasedhair; threadvandals; toking; tolkien; tricksesthieveses; twerentbear; twopantsdupree; velveeeeeeeta; weescarves; whistlinghobbits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,421-10,44010,441-10,46010,461-10,480 ... 48,321-48,323 next last
To: HairOfTheDog
You are saner than everyone else here!

That shouldn't be too hard! :)

10,441 posted on 06/22/2002 4:14:30 PM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10439 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla; ksen
You can send some of that rain this way.
10,442 posted on 06/22/2002 4:17:15 PM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10440 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Well, it's just that the rest of us have already snapped!

Looks like I am coming to late to see anything over on the baseball thread... everything is already deleted... trying to get caught up!
10,443 posted on 06/22/2002 4:25:04 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10440 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
'Looks like I am coming to late to see anything over on the baseball thread... everything is already deleted... trying to get caught up!'

It is nice to see that this guy didn't save this stuff for us Hobbits. This time a pretty good sample of FR was exposed to it. I found it interesting that a couple of his colleagues were upset with his behavior. I'll give this guy and his associate credit for a Luciferian arrogance, and unwillingness to concede at any point.
10,444 posted on 06/22/2002 6:23:01 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10443 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
I am having a nice afternoon... listening to hobbity soundtrack, watching conservatives try to talk about Ann Landers dying on Free Republic, watching transexual men who are prettier than me on MSNBC, and other odd activities.... Life is a carnival of sights to see. How is your day going?
10,445 posted on 06/22/2002 6:30:04 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10444 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
'How is your day going?'

I have been watching an interesting and ironic movie on The History Channel 'Fat Man and Little Boy', starring Paul Newman as General Groves, and the actor who played Barkeley on Star Trek TNG playing Oppenheimer. The movie takes the usual slant, but the irony is having the lefty Newman playing the conservative general, while the leftwing Oppenheimer is played by an actor who I have heard is one of the few Hollywood conservatives (probably why I haven't seen him since).
10,446 posted on 06/22/2002 6:39:10 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10445 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
I think I saw that film...

Actually Paul Newman starred in one of my favorite weekend movies... The Long Hot Summer...

Have you seen that? - also starred Orsen Welles. It was redone later with Don Johnson, but the original was better.
10,447 posted on 06/22/2002 6:55:23 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10446 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
'Have you seen that? - also starred Orsen Welles'

Yes, a wonderful cast, including Angela Lansbury, Joanne Woodward, Tony Franciosa, and the lovely Lee Remick. I think that Faulkner had something to do with it, either he wrote the original story, or the screenplay IMO. Today they like to pretend that nobody thought about sex in the 1950's, but that was a sexy movie, without being lewd.
10,448 posted on 06/22/2002 7:02:21 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10447 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
That's right!

Miss Clara, you slam the door in a man's face before he even knocks on it!

10,449 posted on 06/22/2002 7:06:19 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10448 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Newman learned how to leer in this movie, then used it as virtually his only expression in Hud.
10,450 posted on 06/22/2002 7:17:16 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10449 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
"and the lovely Lee Remick"

Haven't heard that name in awhile. She was pretty, though. I bet not everyone on this thread remembers seeing her in the movies. I also remember her in Experiment in Terror, the guy causing the terror later starred in Wild, Wild West with Robert Conrad.

10,451 posted on 06/22/2002 7:17:19 PM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10448 | View Replies]

To: JenB
When I'm upset, going to Borders and looking at all the books is one of the ways I try to calm myself down. It's usually pretty successful.
10,452 posted on 06/22/2002 7:21:51 PM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10421 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Her early movie I remember best was Anatomy of a Murder with Jimmy Stewart, George C. Scott, Ben Gazarra, and Orson Bean in a small part. They really knew how to make movies in those days.
10,453 posted on 06/22/2002 7:21:55 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10451 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
They really knew how to make movies in those days.

Yeah, and the walk to school was longer, it snowed more, and it was up hill both directions!

Methinks they may some pretty fair movies now....

(I like some of the old classics too...)

10,454 posted on 06/22/2002 7:33:24 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10453 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla; HairOfTheDog
"They really knew how to make movies in those days."

Yes, there were some good ones, in black and white, too.

Went with the family this afternoon to see Attack of the Clones. I didn't think it was very good, even found it somewhat boring. I admit that it was visually stunning, though, I really enjoyed the special effects and special effect scenery, machinery, etc.

That scene where the lovers are frolicking near some waterfalls was a little ridiculous. They looked like Niagara, but sounded like a small drinking fountain. My neighbors fake waterfall in his little swimming pool makes more noise than they did.

But I admit to laughing at Jango Fett's "six gun" scene. Also admit to having had a nice time and to enjoying the movie, even if it wasn't so good.

10,455 posted on 06/22/2002 7:33:57 PM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10453 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Lee Remick would have made a wonderful Galadriel, although Kate Blanchett was fine. Remick was beautiful, and could be both regal and sensual.
10,456 posted on 06/22/2002 7:39:53 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10454 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
I haven't seen it... I will watch when it is on Pay per view... or cable.. hehehe
10,457 posted on 06/22/2002 7:40:37 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10455 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Well, I don't know, somehow it just didn't arouse much emotion or interest in me.

That makes 6 movies I've seen in less than a year. 'Course 5 of them were FOTR.

10,458 posted on 06/22/2002 7:46:53 PM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10457 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Our friends are still going on the Baseball thread. There is a succinct commentary on them at post #318.
10,459 posted on 06/22/2002 7:57:07 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10457 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog; Overtaxed
Hullo, friends. Thanks for the nice support. I feel much better now, being done with work for a whole day! Tomorrow is mine to do with as I please, after church. I am taking my other sister to see Minority Report - the younger one is not allowed to see it, Dad said it was too mature for her. He also said it's the best movie he's seen in years, so I'm excited.

OT, guess what I had for dinner?

10,460 posted on 06/22/2002 8:02:19 PM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10457 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,421-10,44010,441-10,46010,461-10,480 ... 48,321-48,323 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson