Iconic, isn’t it?
ONE enviro-NGO-funded group “is offended”, or ONE-TDS-hating-liberal “doesn’t want to see it”, and that position “has standing” in Washington’s court system.
Tens of thousands of republican voters are disenfranchised and their votes overwhelmed by illegal votes, by fake mail-in-papers, by illegal and improper voting and counting and re-re-re-counting campaigns .. .. .. and those cases are thrown out by 72 different courts. For “no standing”. By the voters in-state, by voters-out-of-state, by voters in the precincts themselves, by the electors, by the representatives who are being voted upon, by the parties in the election, by the state’s AG’s, by the mayors/governors/lawyers’ groups. NOBODY “had standing”.
Great post, Robert Cook. I wondered how seven states’ combined effort had ‘no standing’. If a large chunk of the United States doesn’t in such an important matter then the court may as well disband, because no one does. But logic, like justice, is not The Law.
The article claims that nothing can be done to properly remedy this vagary and countries that tried fall victim to “mischief”. I can’t see why (other than corruption) Congress can’t enact laws to specifically define what merits standing and what doesn’t, putting a stop to the judiciary using that argument as an easy opt out of responsibility.
If they did that, having recovered their gonads, they should define exact limits of district court powers and jurisdictions so those judges may be relieved of their self-appointed Presidential duties.