ALSO, she attempted to gently fall from the back window in an attempt to ESCAPE because she feared being caught by her husband. This wasn't a suicide attempt!
HANG THE SELFISH BI*CH and RID THIS EARTH of this DEMONIC being, PRONTO.
Hung jury?
If I understand correctly, the DA would then have to decide whether to re-file the charges and try the case again.
Given public pressure and the media spotlight, perhaps the case wouldn’t be tried again? We’ll see.
There is no greater danger to America than white liberal women!!!
It’s as if they’re trying to legalize retroactive abortions.
I think a holdout saved an acquittal
“Hail Mary”?
The NYP needs to get a little educated on Judeo-Christian heritage
Mary is known primarily for saying yes to family
Read the freakin room
“””A judge declared a mistrial in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial Friday on the seventh day of deliberations — but gave her defiant lawyer one hour to file an emergency appeal against the ruling.””””
Above statement not correct. Judge said he WILL DECLARE A MISTRIAL.
So the jurors will now have to cool their jets for one hour.
Perhaps the DA should have cast a wider net and tried on a less rigorous standard, by charging second degree murder instead of first degree murder
I’m not blaming the DA
It was clearly first degree murder
But perhaps the DA (and most right-thinking Americans) didn’t recognize the potential uber-stupidity of “a jury of her peers,” as well as the general emotional/anxious train-wreck and lunacy that is the state of woke urban females in 2026
Sounds like all but one wanted to declare her not guilty. Good for that one to refuse to cave. Now, prosecutors, do a better job of picking jurors. And shame on defense attorneys who couldn’t care less about justice, but only about winning.
ALSO, she attempted to gently fall from the back window in an attempt to ESCAPE because she feared being caught by her husband. This wasn't a suicide attempt!
HANG THE SELFISH BI*CH and RID THIS EARTH of this DEMONIC being, PRONTO.
I heard from the TV lawyers on Fox that Massachusetts law puts the burden on the state to prove the person isn’t insane instead of just proving guilt, instead of putting the burden on the defense to prove ther client is insane.
🚨 BREAKING — IT'S OFFICIAL: The judge in the Lindsay Clancy trial has declared a MISTRIAL after a LONE MALE juror BLOCKED a NOT GUILTY VERDICT for Clancy
This man is an absolute HERO!
THANK YOU for REFUSING to give in to the DERANGED jurors trying to let a baby kiIIer go free!pic.twitter.com/GT43k7bS6N— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 4, 2026
Only one person asked for clarification of “beyond reasonable doubt.” That, in itself, does not entail that there was only one holdout. Do we know that there were no more?
One strong male stood strong. Even as the others complained to judge he was the only one who did not understand reason and doubt. He will be made known by media.
The 56%ers strike again.
Nine deranged women with female thinking disorder, all feeling virtuous about themselves by ‘empathizing’ with the murderer;
Two weak-minded beta males who gave in and submitted to female threats and browbeating;
One man.
Strangulation takes time: about 2 minutes for the victim to pass out and a couple more to make sure they're dead. She had to deliberately do this from one child to the next.
On the one hand, the fact that she planned this and carried it out but somehow- magically!- managed to not plan her own suicide effectively all strongly suggest she's a psychopath, not a mental case.
On the other hand, from my experience having taken some medication that completely removed any anxiety from doing utterly dangerous things, there is a legitimate question whether the meds turned her into a psychopath.
I can easily see how a jury could split, but only 1 holdout seems very strange.
‘Stop looking for f*ing loopholes’: Cardi B torches Clancy's defense for using postpartum psychosis
To declare sanity in deliberation beyond a reasonable doubt before committing a crime is a very high bar,
It’s Utah law that is the problem here.