That’s exactly what it has to mean. One man....and we have to assume its one of the 3 men on the jury.....actually wants to hold her accountable for her CRIMES and will not give in to no doubt a tidal wave of bullying attempts by all the Karens on the jury.
And the insistence on the meaning of “reasonable doubt” — that one guy must be reasonably sure of her guilt. While I suppose the other 11 are thinking, “It could have been aliens! Or a wizard! Who knows? I wasn’t there! Anything could have happened! I think of myself as a reasonable person, and I have my doubts, so ...”
That’s the way I read it also.
I have to wonder of what charges the jury shares the most agreement with.I doubt they all just want to let her walk but i’ll bet it’s the mental impairment verdict which will send her to a mental hospital for a long time.
Meanwhile i just read a verdict against a Scizo man who was found guilty killing all 5 of his kids and it’s possibly the death penalty for him. Now i don’t know if the death penalty still has to be voted or if final sentencing by the judge will lead to death, but the jury found him guilty(in just 2 hours) in the case where the dealth penalty was not taken off the table.