Tucker Carlson All But Endorses ‘Trumpian’ Democrat Abdul El-Sayed: ‘I Wouldn’t Vote for Mike Rogers at Gunpoint’

Tucker Carlson praised Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic Senate nominee in Michigan, calling the candidate’s agenda “literally Trumpian.”

El-Sayed prevailed in last month’s Democratic primary over Rep. Haley Stevens, despite being outspent nine-to-one, thanks in large part to more than $30 million in ad buys from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. He has pledged to oppose continued U.S. aid to Israel.

El-Sayed’s Republican opponent is former Rep. Mike Rogers, who chaired the House Intelligence Committee and has been a fervent supporter of Israel. Given Americans’ increasingly negative views of Israel, Rogers’ campaign is reportedly concerned about AIPAC spending money on its behalf.

On Wednesday’s Tucker Carlson Show, the host spoke with Saagar Enjeti, co-host of Breaking Points, where the two discussed, among other topics, the race in Michigan.

Enjeti responded by noting that Rogers lost a Senate race to Democrat Elissa Slotkin in 2024, despite Donald Trump carrying Michigan that year.

“And so that’s the candidate,” Enjeti said. “A literal loser who lost when Donald Trump won the state, just to show you how much of a headwind he had at his back.”

“He’s basically a tool of Israel and the intelligence agencies, Carlson replied. “How would you run someone like that? I don’t– it doesn’t even make sense...”

Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim

Why do you suppose liberal anti-Israel Europe is taking in as many Muslims as possible? And Why does Prince Charles celebrate Muslim holidays and not Christian ones?

Regardless, I’m America first.

America First doesn’t push Americans deeper into debt to give money to foreign countries.

America First doesn’t go halfway around the world to start wars on behalf of foreign countries.

Europe can choke on Muslims, for all I care. I’m concerned about American shores and American families.

It makes no sense to go to war with Iran with the pretense of preventing them being nuclear armed, and then feign indifference whether Muslims take over two of the three nuclear powers in Europe.

Many of them are in the thrall of Jewish organizations like Spectre’s and Soros’, that make every effort to suborn their native cultures with hostile alien cultures to weaken them. They’ve been brainwashed for more than a generation that up is down and multiculturalism has superior outcomes to homogenous societies, despite all evidence.

Soros is hated by conservatives in Israel and America, and fiercely opposed. Soros made his millions turning Conservative Jewish families over to the NAZIs. Israel doesn’t believe in multiculturalism, neither do America’s conservative Jews. And there certainly are as many or more subversive ethnic European leftists groups bringing in Islamists. They too, are hated by Israel and conservative Jews in America.

America First doesn’t push Americans deeper into debt to give money to foreign countries. America First doesn’t go halfway around the world to start wars on behalf of foreign countries.

I agree with you on giving money to foreign countries. I don’t believe we should do this. That said, we give much more money to the Islamic Nations. At least Israel provides technology we use in combat. But we should indeed cut off funding.

It makes no sense to go to war with Iran with the pretense of preventing them being nuclear armed, and then feign indifference whether Muslims take over two of the three nuclear powers in Europe.

If you understand the petrodollar system, it makes perfect sense. One threat to the petrodollar at a time. Iraq, Libya, Russia, Venezuela, Nigeria, Iran, etc. Not that I agree with the petrodollar system, but that is what we are stuck with for now. At some point, we could indeed have to turn our sites on Islamic Europe. Which may explain why Trump is starting to pull back from NATO.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.