To: All
The country is only half occupied . There are plenty of places to put these buildings if no one really wants any of them near them.
8 posted on
08/31/2026 8:16:33 AM PDT by
escapefromboston
(Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
To: escapefromboston
plenty of places Distance from population is part of the trade off. The further away it is from people connecting to it, the greater the latency.
14 posted on
08/31/2026 8:32:31 AM PDT by
fruser1
To: escapefromboston
Do we have any shuttered military bases that may be a viable candidate for a days center?
To: escapefromboston
A DATA CENTER PROPOSED IN N UTAH ADMITTED IT WOULD HAVE POWER DEMANDS THAT EXCEED THE CURRENT POWER USAGE OF THE ENTIRE STATE OF UTAH. ENTIRE STATE.
BUSINESSES
RANCHES
FARMS
RESIDENTS
ALL ARE SUPPOSED TO FADE AWAY FOR A 40,000 ACRE DATA CENTER THAT WANTS TO HAVE ALL THE POWER????????????????
28 posted on
08/31/2026 9:58:01 AM PDT by
ridesthemiles
(not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: escapefromboston
There are plenty of places to put these buildings Yes: "brownfield" former industrial sites.
36 posted on
08/31/2026 12:13:25 PM PDT by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: escapefromboston
Data Centers need to be close to where they are being used.
42 posted on
09/01/2026 11:36:21 AM PDT by
packrat35
(“When discourse ends, violence begins.” – Charlie Kirk, and they killed him anyway)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson