Hauling out 80K troops from Europe might have consequence[s] folks aren’t considering here (and it could be intentional from this angle).
Those 80K are probably a significant deterrent to islamic forces deciding to go “all in” on seizing significant territory up to and including entire national structures. Now, we could be doing it in part to prompt this earlier rather than later. Remaining there, with governments as they are, essentially just facilitates a continuous slow influx of the islamics coupled with constant coddling and supplication from the nations governing bodies. If we pull those troops and equipment out the islamists may play their hand early enough that the native populations have a shot at overcoming and expelling them along with cleaning out all of their native born political excrement. If we end up having to go back in we would be doing so with the enemy greatly weakened along with their command structure revealed and impaired.
The “islam” concern ought to be one that Europe starts really shining about, since that is their biggest threat. Perhaps we can concentrate in a few acceptably free countries and abandon the rest.
A concern I have is Britain having nukes. If the raggedy people take over Britain, as they seem to want to do, then they will inherit those nukes. And you know who is the target of them. Israel, of course, but also the great satin, the US. That simply cannot happen.
🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻