Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White woman stands trial over claims she called autistic black boy, 8, racist word in playground during fight over applesauce
daily mail ^ | July 21 2026 | JOE HUTCHISON

Posted on 07/21/2026 9:59:55 AM PDT by Morgana

A white woman has gone on trial over claims she racially abused an autistic black boy in a playground after a spat over applesauce.

Shiloh Hendrix, 37, was filmed allegedly calling a young black boy the 'N-word' at a park in Rochester, Minnesota, last April.

Video of the exchange went viral and Hendrix was charged with three counts of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor charge with a maximum of 90 days in jail.

Hendrix, who has pleaded not guilty, appeared on Monday in Olmsted County District Court as jury selection got underway for her trial.

The jury will decide whether her behavior was unlawful and likely to cause violence, or if her words are protected under the First Amendment.

According to KTTC, Hendrix's lawyer Brian Karalus raised concerns that he did not have a list of witnesses that the state intended to call during trial.

Prosecutors said they would not release their witness list due to safety concerns, they also said that Karalus knew this and had made no prior objections, the outlet said.

KAALTV reported that right wing activist Jake Lang was in court as proceedings got underway, while protestors outside held sings calling for Hendrix to be freed.

Jury selection is expected to continue today which will be followed by opening statements.


TOPICS: Food; Local News
KEYWORDS: minnesota; shilohhendrix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last
To: Labyrinthos

Incorrect.

“Likely to cause violence” != “Fighting words”

Two different things. SCOTUS will overturn.


101 posted on 07/21/2026 12:43:26 PM PDT by DarrellZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Impolite but illegal?


102 posted on 07/21/2026 12:46:18 PM PDT by ArcadeQuarters (You can't remove RINOs by voting for them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Notice they used a lower case ‘W’ when spelling “white woman.”


103 posted on 07/21/2026 12:55:36 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

She’s guilty of being white though so expect a conviction.


104 posted on 07/21/2026 1:21:24 PM PDT by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

So every rapper will be arrested?


105 posted on 07/21/2026 1:35:38 PM PDT by dynachrome (“They don’t kill you because you’re a Nazi; they call you a Nazi so they can kill you.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Unbelievable how much trouble someone can get into on a playground or in school.

“Hunter Yelton, a six-year-old in Cañon City, Colorado, was suspended for two days and had “sexual harassment” placed on his school disciplinary record for kissing a female classmate on the hand during a reading group.
This would have labeled him a sex offender.

Following national outrage and media scrutiny, the school district met with the boy’s mother and changed the infraction from “sexual harassment” to “misconduct,” removing the severe label from his permanent file.”


2015 case.
A 13-year-old boy in Pikesville, Maryland, was criminally charged as a juvenile with second-degree assault after grabbing a 14-year-old female classmate on a dare and kissing her against her will.
School officials could have handled the incident internally under the student code of conduct, but instead opted to involve county police. The officers who responded to the scene acted under state law in charging the boy with misdemeanor second degree assault. This offense carries a maximum penalty of ten years in jail, but because this incident will be filed as a juvenile case the statutory maximum penalties do not apply.
Police indicated later that he could avoid court entirely if deemed eligible for the Juvenile Offenders in Need of Supervision Program. In addition to police involvement, he faced internal school disciplinary actions, such as suspension or expulsion.
——CBS News, others but I cannot find the eventual outcome of this case.


106 posted on 07/21/2026 3:10:20 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Free speech?

Political activist and comedian Dick Gregory used the “n” word for the title of his autobiography, which he said was to defuse its power to hurt fellow black people:
“Dear Momma—Wherever you are, if ever you hear the word ‘n-——’ again, remember they are advertising my book.”

(I censored it from the quote.)


107 posted on 07/21/2026 3:13:45 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrmeyer
She’s guilty of being white though so expect a conviction.

And that is an accusation that cannot be rubbed off or washed off.

PWW. "Prosecuted While White."

108 posted on 07/21/2026 3:18:48 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

You got it, nigg*r preferential treatment. If everything were reversed the white woman would still been arrested.


109 posted on 07/21/2026 3:53:15 PM PDT by Ronald77 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
(AI response to query):

To qualify as fighting words, the speech must meet strict criteria:
It must be a direct personal insult or epithet directed at a specific individual.
It must occur in a face-to-face confrontation rather than in public discourse or online.
It must be of such a nature that an average person would be likely to react with immediate violence.

The Supreme Court has significantly narrowed the doctrine’s application over time, ruling that mere offensiveness, vulgarity, or hate speech does not automatically constitute fighting words if it lacks the intent or likelihood of causing an immediate physical altercation.

Consequently, while the doctrine remains a legal exception to free speech, it is rarely used to uphold convictions in modern jurisprudence.

110 posted on 07/21/2026 5:18:04 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Mother Nature needs to give El Nino a good spanking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson