Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/07/2026 5:56:44 AM PDT by MtnClimber
This year’s primary season features the rapid ascent within the Democratic Party of the faction going by the name “Democratic Socialists of America.” Despite the gratuitous co-opting of the label “Democratic,” it is by no means clear that the DSA faction would continue open elections once they had achieved enough power to end them. Instead, the DSA adopts the hardest of hard-line socialist positions on every issue.
I previously reported in my June 24 post that the DSA candidates in New York had accomplished nearly a clean sweep of all the Democratic Party congressional and state legislative primaries in which they had participated. Since then, a DSA candidate has knocked out a 15-term incumbent progressive Democrat in a safe Democratic district in Colorado. And The Washington Examiner reports on June 25 that DSA candidates have succeeded in some 30 down-ballot primary races in “Oregon, California, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Utah, Maryland,” as well as New York.
So who are these people calling themselves “Democratic Socialists”? I’ve spent some time researching the biographies of these successful candidates. Remarkably, there is a pattern that repeats time after time, with only slight variations. Your budding Communist ideologue comes from a family that has recently achieved modest or even substantial (but not extreme) success in the free market economy; and then a member of the next generation goes away to school at some “elite” institution, often on scholarship, studying some subject where leftist orthodoxy is pervasive (African Studies, Middle Eastern Studies and Sociology are typical examples). The scion then either remains in school indefinitely, or leaves school but disdains the private economy and dabbles in political organizing or other left-wing not-for-profit endeavors. Combine this sort of background with a sense of entitlement, and the result is a bitter, angry, resentful young person, with no understanding of the blessings of freedom or of the private economy, completely ignorant of human history and convinced that the socialist/communist program will quickly lead to utopia.
Let’s take a few examples.
Zohran Mamdani. His family arrived from Uganda (of all places) via South Africa when young Zohran was seven. The father became a professor of left-wing claptrap at Columbia, while the mother became a relatively successful film director. In other words, Zohran is nothing close to “working class.” Young Zohran then went away to fancy Bowdoin in Maine, where he majored in “Africana Studies.” He then spent around a decade without ever having a real job, dabbling in political campaigns, “organizing,” pretending to be a rapper, and claiming to be “oppressed.”
Darializa Avila Chevalier. After graduating near the top of her high school class in Florida, Ms. Avila Chevalier got a scholarship to Columbia in 2014, where she repaid the generosity of her sponsors by joining the anti-Semitic Students for Justice in Palestine, and the co-founding Columbia University Apartheid Divest. Twelve years later, Avila Chevalier continues to be a “graduate student” in Sociology at CUNY. Although she claims to have spent at least some time as an “investigator” for a public defender organization, almost everything in her Wikipedia biography consists of organizing and leading protests of one sort or another, and it appears that her lifestyle has been supported for the last twelve years mostly to entirely by scholarships and fellowships (likely taxpayer-funded).
Melat Kiros. This is the 29 year old woman who just won the Democratic primary for the Colorado congressional seat covering Denver. Her family immigrated from Ethiopia when she was an infant. According to her campaign website, her father went to pharmacy school in the U.S., so presumably is a pharmacist now. Kiros went to private colleges (Washington College in Maryland) and law school (Notre Dame). She landed a job at elite Sidley & Austin in New York, and then promptly got herself fired in 2023 for writing an anti-Israel screed. She has spent the last three years as a graduate student at the University of Colorado Denver.
Mamdani, Avila Chevalier, and Kiros (and the other DSA candidates) follow in well-worn footsteps of many famous predecessors — all of whom seem to have very similar biographies. Consider:
Pol Pot. I wrote a post about this guy back in 2021. From that post:
Pol Pot (birth name: Saloth Sar) was born in 1925 to a relatively wealthy farming family (Kiernan: “In later years the family would have been ‘class enemies.’”) with some 30 acres of land and six buffalo. One of Sar’s cousins was a dancer in the royal palace, and became one of the King’s principal wives; then one of his sisters moved into the palace and also became a royal consort. By the age of six, Sar too had moved into the royal palace, and after that was sent to top French colonial schools of the time. In his early twenties, they sent him off for further education in Paris. Big mistake. That’s where he took up the trendy Communism of the day. What later became the Khmer Rouge inner circle — in addition to Pol Pot, it was the Thiounn brothers, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary and Son Sen — were all his pals from his days as a student in Paris.
Lenin. Although Lenin’s paternal grandfather had been impoverished, his father was a striver who (according to Wikipedia) worked himself up to Director of Public Schools for a Russian province, and got himself awarded a hereditary title of nobility! Lenin went off to Kazan University, where he promptly began associating with the radicals of the time.
Karl Marx. The story of Karl Marx, creator of Communism, is no different. He was the son of a prosperous lawyer, Heinrich Marx, but had a huge sense of entitlement and was angry and resentful that he should have to work to make a living. Here is a famous quote from a letter that Marx’s father wrote to him in November 1837:
"Frankly speaking, my dear Karl, I do not like this modern word, which all weaklings use to cloak their feelings when they quarrel with the world because they do not possess, without labour or trouble, well-furnished palaces with vast sums of money and elegant carriages. This embitterment disgusts me and you are the last person from whom I would expect it. What grounds can you have for it? Has not everything smiled on you ever since your cradle? Has not nature endowed you with magnificent talents? Have not your parents lavished affection on you? Have you ever up to now been unable to satisfy your reasonable wishes?
Really, it’s hard to say it better than Heinrich Marx said it. These “socialists” are a crop of spoiled and ignorant losers who “quarrel with the world because they do not possess, without labour or trouble, well-furnished palaces with vast sums of money and elegant carriages.” At the moment, that seems to be the key to electoral success in primaries within the Democratic Party. Let’s only hope that it does not translate to general election success.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Right now I’d say it’s the desire for revenge on Trump and anyone who voted for him. The enemy of your enemy is your friend, or something like that. Modern Democrats have no problem cutting off their noses to spite their faces, they’d destroy the nation just to see anything Trump not get their way.
And they seem to believe they will be above the rules and laws of communism, those rules would only apply to us as they party with the elites.
Ask a young socialist commie what position they will have in their communist paradise. Will they be a bus driver? elevator operator. steel plant worker? Machine operator? Office accountant?
All will say they will take positions in the Party of power telling others what to do.
In their words, they are like Cousin Eddie, not doing actual work but holding out for MANAGEMENT POSITIONS.
No different from Hitler or Marx as both hated physical labor.
Democratic Socialists of America = Dazis
At their core, people who embrace communism seem to have similiar personality disorders. They are narcissistic, have no tolerance for others, are distainful of their culture and are not capable of love.This disorder has been observed and documented since history and literature has been recorded. It leads one to the opinion that this behavior is dictated by a gene that results in a set of neuro pathways that results in this mental state. Such people are a disaster for civilization.
"Why should I work when I can just go steal it from someone else?
Communism is a form of government. The desire for it comes from envy and hence coveting, which is part of the innate sinful state of mankind.
Brainwashing
They get to them in the schools when they are young and stupid.
Two old books on this topic:
https://www.amazon.com/ENVY-Theory-Behaviour-Helmut-Schoeck/dp/0865970645
https://www.amazon.com/Anti-Capitalistic-Mentality-Ludwig-Von-Mises/dp/1169831389
A lazy ass and a lazy mind seems to be the common denominator.
there are only two kinds of politicians.
-Stupid
-Evil
(although the categories are not mutually exclusive)
exactly. they want stuff without working for it.
I have a nephew who is in his 50’s, 2 useless Master degrees, he hates anybody who has a dollar more than he does.
Because he deserves it, because of his degrees.
His job has zero to do with his degrees, btw.
It would be cool to have those stamps.
The point of a gun.
The minimum wage is an anti communist feature. With the cheap labor express demanding unbridled immigration a floor on wages MAKES TOTAL SENSE..
A person becomes a communist to camouflage his lack of work ethic.
That may be a bit simplistic but not by much. You talk to them for a while and it quickly becomes clear they have no idea what or how their system would work beyond, take other people's stuff. To those that cry about how that is not "killing people" if you take people's stuff it is going to have to be by force, (IE killing people) and they will resist because once you have taken people's stuff, they tend to die.
Take a look at every "socialist" system on planet earth, there is a pile of dead people. And they keep adding more and more people to the pile the longer it goes on. That is not a bug, that is a feature.
"Capitalism" is a pejorative invented by communists.
LOL
What causes it?
A no-brainer: 65 years of total federal control of public education, and the communist wannabees who became “teachers”...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.