Aren’t being a “tradwife” and “influencer” mutually exclusive?
I understand that “tradewife” content could be helpful to some. But would such a person actually call themselves a “tradwide” and would they really post stuff about their family?
Much like the person who wrote this book. Very likely they have never had an actual job.
As an aside, I despise the “influencer” nomenclature and I absolutely hate the term “tradwife.”
My wife was a stay at home mom until the kids were deep into school years. We had her mom living with us after her Dad passed. We never had to hire a babysitter. My kids grew up knowing their grandmother and all of her kind of eccentric old friends. It made my kids more comfortable about older people—which has served them well in life.
Traditional values are great.
And no…we never churned butter or sewed our own clothes. Although I did show my grandkids how to make butter last fall. They were enthralled by it.
I saw someone relate tradwife to BDSM not really a normal classic wife.
Meaning she has to be ready to be bent over and do whatever he wants (like a submissive).
I don’t know much about it and what they truly believe and if this is just redefining terms like the left likes to do, but it was a conservative that said it.
On the surface Tradwife sounds great for us, but then again there are extremes to it I’m sure.
BTW: if you want a tradwife (1950s wife as what I think of)...marry a Japanese woman. I did that and it’s amazing.
They respect gender and roles. You’ll want to put them on a pedastal and respect them. And they will take care of you.
She marries a buffoon and is pregnant at 20. Sounds delightful. Who wouldn’t want to be a tradwife?. 😄
When the portrayal of marriage starts with the subject having made a huge mistake in who they married, I would probably assume it is going to be anti that marriage regardless of what kind of marriage, and regardless of what decade or century.
It’s called house wife.