“I also suspect that your definition of “properly integrated” would be used as an all-purpose “backdoor excuse” to explain away any of their failures.”
your suspicions are both wrong and completely CONTRADICTORY to what I have ALREADY written above —
- Post 164: “they SHOULD BE MADE to accept the societal mores and culture of the culture they move to.”
- Post 147: “There must be strict education in American culture and values.”
- Post 141: “Education must be harsher - a very detailed study of history, civics and “ways to behave in this society” coupled with detailed language studies - not just reading 10+ books a year in English but also learning Latin, possibly Greek and at least one other language (can be Czech, can be Cantonese, can be Xhosa) along with more complex maths and science and kids to be FAILED in a year.”
What about the much-simpler solution of not letting them in in the first place?
If we agreed that the U.S. has no choice but to let in droves of Third-World migrants (and I most certainly do not!), then, of course, the policies and measures might be worthy of consideration
But I don't accept your (as-yet justified) premise that the U.S. has no choice but to allow itself to be inundated with peoples who could be "integrated" only using such measures!
Regards,