Your comment has nothing to do with the article.
Your statements have been proven false and instead of acknowledging your errors you jump topic.
You said “múnster crazies don’t represent Anabaptists” which is historically false as the surviving Melchiorite Anabaptists—including many who had been sympathetic to or involved with the Münster movement became the Mennonites.
Therefore, modern peaceful Anabaptists are literally the direct theological and historical descendants of the exact group that produced Münster
Do you deny this historical fact and admit that your statement was false?
And your historical knowledge us as flawed and error filled as your false theology.
Constantine wasn’t even baptized until he was on his deathbed in 337 AD—and he was baptized by Eusebius of Nicomedia, who was an Arian heretic, not a Catholic.
Your claim that Constantine “militarized Christianity into a war religion” hinges on the idea that he legally combined the Roman state apparatus with the Church. He did the exact opposite.
In 313 AD, Constantine and his co-emperor Licinius issued the Edict of Milan. Go read the text. It did not make Christianity the state religion. It did not ban paganism. It was a declaration of absolute, universal religious pluralism and liberty.
The Bishop of Rome (the Pope) during the Council of Nicaea (325 AD) was Pope Sylvester I. Sylvester didn’t attend Nicaea; he sent legates to represent the established, pre-existing Catholic hierarchy.
Your claims about Constantine sgiw you haven’t read a single history book covering the 4th century.
Your historical facts are almost as false as your theology
Oh and just to keep you happy.
The Baptist denomination isn’t derived from the Anabaptists despite the similar sounding name.
The Baptist denomination was founded in 1609 by John Smith and it arose out of the Church of England.
So don’t worry, you Baptists have nothing to do with Anabaptists