Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 05/05/2026 12:24:21 PM PDT by TBP
The psyop of Nick Fuentes is now complete. In case you were wondering why the NY Times has been glorifying him and he is botted on social media according to @elonmusk and why he was never arrested over J6 when people who did far less were:
He is a Democrat and just admitted to being a “moderate Democrat” on his show. If this is what the Moderate Democrats look like, imagine how much worse the Woke and Radical left democrats are.
His sole litmus test is hating Israel. It’s been obvious for a while Nick made a deal with the Democrats. Now we can all see it.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The irony here is that Laura Loomer is an even bigger nutcase than Fuentes, and manages to be even more shrill and obnoxious. She's just as likely to be a false flag and psyops case as Fuentes, so I suspect that her expose of him is just a ploy to distract attention from her own near-psychotic behavior.
Yes, Loomer is a nutcase and she lost me altogether when she claimed Casey DeSantis faked her cancer, sounding just as bad as the 2020 Democrats who claimed President Trump faked COVID. Whether you like DeSantis or not, that is just an awful claim that reveals a terrible human being.
However, she’s still not as bad as Fuentes. Fuentes is an immature, insane Nazi beta cuck.
You keep claiming it’s a clipped video and that we’re all lying, but you Fuentes fascists NEVER tell the truth about anything and hove NO credibility, so why don’t you find and post the entire clip?
We’re waiting. One bit of actual facts or evidence from your side.
Loser.
Tells you how bad the other ones are.
Prove it.
No one with at least 2 brain cells would believe that he is claiming to be a “moderate democrat”
I rest my case.
I wonder how many nutcases like Loomer are the genuine article as opposed to psyops plants working to discredit conservatism.
Loomer HATES DeSantis for some reason.
Moonbats like Loomer develop irrational hatreds towards people for no reason at all - just disliking how someone looks or sounds is enough, or perhaps a slight disagreement on some trivial issue. Loomer is a waste of space, and I wasn't thrilled when Trump started hobnobbing with her and giving her an audience, when she ought to be treated as the scummy tar baby that she is.
“Let’s analyze your position in light of US interests...”
Hilarious use of the false dilemma fallacy.
Back to Logic 1 for you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
There's a lot of DDS on our side just because he dared entered the primary against Trump.
They will probably hate him more when he runs against H1-B JD in 2028.
The video does not look fake to me.
Carlson has done a good job of documenting that Carlson is pro-Islam and anti-Jew. They seem to be two peas in the same pod. This video seems to fit in. One Fuentes interview (post 37) has him complaining that Carlson took too long to be anti-Israel.
The J6 video at post 6 is damning as well. It’s a small image and perhaps could have been edited. Has Fuentes disowned it? What are his connections to Charlottsville, if any?
He’s articulate and draws you in, but he’s just bad news. Whoever you are, however, you see yourself, you can do better. If you think the problem is the boomers or the Jews, you’re just plain wrong.
Fuentes said “I don’t know about 2028 but for 2026, I am a non woke moderate democrat now” then he immediately followed by “I am an afro-latino non woke democrat” which clearly shows he never meant to say he is a “moderate democrat”, except for sarcasm.
But you conviently ignore the context by not citing the second sentence in order to double down on your stupid narrative.
Even when I gave you the full context, you still keep clipping his quotes, you lying piece of shit!
What's the difference? Moonbat Loomer is pro-Israel whereas lesser Moonbat Fuentes is not. So it seems that there's only one litmus test for legitimacy as far as some people on this site are concerned, and that's being unconditionally pro-Israel.
Nothign about that says sarcasm. Fuentes, in cse you hvaen’t noticed, is a Spanish name.
I already caught you lying and contradicting yourself and you’re still here making a fool of yourself.
Now go whine to the moderators.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.