Posted on 05/04/2026 11:32:14 AM PDT by ransomnote
RealRobert
@Real_RobN
·
23hAnd this is
King Solomon Reporting:
Newly released documents from the National Archives confirm—beyond a shadow of a doubt—that then–Vice President Joe Biden routinely handled sensitive government information through private Gmail accounts.
Over 82,000 pages of emails have been uncovered, including messages sent under fake names—surpassing the volume involved in Hillary Clinton’s infamous espionage scandal.
Classified documents include Obama briefing material notes, situation room meeting notes, intelligence reports, NSA leaks, and communications with foreign leaders—all sent to Joe Biden’s private email accounts. And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
In other words: The Intelligence Community Inspector General confirmed that Hillary Clinton’s emails—stored on her unsecured personal server in a bathroom closet—contained intelligence from the U.S. government’s most secretive and highly classified program: Special Access Programs (SAPs).
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL Charles McCullough III stated:
“The comprehensive review by the intelligence agencies—who have final say on classification matters—found several dozen emails containing classified information at the CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, and TOP SECRET/SAP levels.”
“That is even more sensitive than top secret.”
“There is no mistake—you don’t accidentally stumble across it and not realize what it is.”
Meaning: Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are guilty under the Espionage Act, in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 793: Gathering, transmitting, or losing national defense information.
And yet, Donald Trump was the one who was raided.
May 3, 2026
~~~TRANSCRIPT EXCERPTS and MY NOTES BEGIN
John Solomon: Let me just tell you what stands out to the experts. I'm just a journalist, but here's what the experts said:
When, a day before it happens, there is a Situation Room classified briefing, and the date, the time, the participants and the subject are sitting on an insecure email of Joe Biden's, that allows spies to perhaps hack into the meeting, but if not hack into the meeting, target the people who were in attendance to try to spy on them after the fact to find out what happened in a secret meeting inside the White House Situation Room.
These conversations that are going involve world leaders, like the Iraqi leader.
At one point there's a very sensitive transmission sent to, forwarded to Joe Biden's email account from a conversation the State Department had with the President of Brazil, who had just found out that the NSA had spied on her, and the transmission back is, 'Don't worry, she's not going to shout out the US government and shame them.' That's going in real time to Joe Biden's insecure email account. This is sensitive stuff.
Why does it still matter today? Joe Biden is gone; he's never going to hold power again. He might not even know where he is today. But here's why it matters.
There's never been a full damage assessment conducted by the United States intelligence community, or Congress, to determine what sort of gains enemies might have made having access to stuff that got into his garage, into his private email account. It's important for Tulsi Gabbard, for John Radcliffe, for the intelligence committees to look at this stuff and assess how much damage was done so that we can adjust, and make sure we don't make these mistakes in the future.
ransomnote: interviewer asks about those around him sending secret information to his unsecured gmail account.
John Solomon: Oh that is a great question. As we know President Trump has pulled a lot of security clearances recently for good reason. There are lots of people on these emails. We'll see if their security clearances are pulled for the nonchallant way they moved sensitive information into this thing.
ransomnote: The interview continues. Solomon says James Comer and Ron Johnson are on this. He says Joe Biden and the National Archives slow walked exposure of this information but it's finally surfacing. Of the 82,000, Solomon went through a FOIA process to obtain access and has only seen a few thousand. He said a law firm helped him gain access and it took tens of thousands of dollars but exposure is happening now.
~~~~END OF MY NOTES AND TRANSCRIPT EXCERPTS
Grok adds context:
The video clip in the X post (from May 3, 2026) is a recent segment featuring John Solomon (often styled as "King Solomon Reporting" in viral clips), likely from one of his regular appearances on Real America's Voice News.- The post presents John Solomon's reporting on National Archives releases detailing Joe Biden's use of private Gmail accounts with pseudonyms like robinware456@gmail.com while vice president, involving over 82,000 pages of emails with Obama briefings, situation room notes, intelligence reports, and foreign leader communications.
- It highlights security risks from routing sensitive information through insecure personal accounts and compares the scale to Hillary Clinton's email server, citing the Intelligence Community Inspector General's findings on classified SAP material in her case.
- The commentary contrasts these incidents with the FBI raid on Donald Trump over classified documents, raising points about enforcement consistency under the Espionage Act without full damage assessments conducted.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
I hate that man more than any other.
great post. THANKS!
There was definitely a huge effort to not leave a paper trail. Clinton Admin did it with the un-retrievable archives, then the Obama Admin did it with the whole senior leadership, each with voice-only meetings, and with external emails.
This was a substantial reason for the Obama Admin covering so hard for Clinton with her server.
Gotta protect that purple lipped Kenyan at all costs. The world will burn to protect that muslim communist.
Newly released documents from the National Archives confirm—beyond a shadow of a doubt—that then–Vice President Joe Biden and Barack Obama were in collusion-——routinely mishandling sensitive government information, which were reroutrd through private Gmail accounts.
Acts commonly described as “collusion” can violate various criminal laws. When high-ranking government officials work secretly to violate U.S. laws, they can be prosecuted for several offenses.
Here is the breakdown of the legal landscape:
1. What is “Collusion” Legally?
While “collusion” is often used in political discourse to mean improper, secretive cooperation with foreign or hostile entities, it is not a specific legal charge. The relevant criminal terms are conspiracy, aiding and abetting, or solicitation.
2. Potential Crimes in “Collusion”If “collusion” involves working with a foreign power to influence an election or violate other laws, it may trigger the following charges:Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371): This is the most common charge, covering agreements to interfere with government functions through deceit or dishonesty.
Foreign Contribution Violations (52 U.S.C. § 30121): It is illegal for a foreign national to contribute money or “anything of value” to a campaign. If government officials cooperate in receiving such value (e.g., hacked data), it is a crime.
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. § 1030): Assisting, advising, or facilitating foreign hackers (e.g., DNC emails) can violate this act.
Treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381): In extreme cases, if collusion involves aiding enemies during a declared war, it can be charged as treason, though this is rare.
3. Obstruction of Justice
Often, the act of “collusion” is less likely to be proven than the subsequent attempt to hide it. If officials lie to investigators or try to cover up the activity, they can be charged with:False Statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001): Lying to federal agents.Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1505/1512): Lying to Congress or coaching others to lie.
4. Special Considerations for Public Officials
High-ranking federal officials are subject to specific bribery, graft, and conflict-of-interest statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 201–227). Under § 201(b), soliciting, accepting, or agreeing to receive anything of value in exchange for an official act (a quid pro quo) is a serious felony.
Summary Table
Alleged Activity
Potential Legal Charge
Secretly helping foreign entities
Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371)
Accepting “dirt” on a political opponent from a foreign source
Campaign Finance Violation (52 U.S.C. § 30121)
Covering up contacts
False Statements / Obstruction (18 U.S.C. § 1001, 1512)
Offering official acts for favors
Bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201)
Enough with the "play nice" kid gloves.
Like THAT will ever happen. I’m sick to death with all the righteous indignation amounting to nothing but sound and fury. It’s all bullsh*t and everybody knows it. No one will ever be held to account, so just put a sock in it already.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.