Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too
Why go through the rigors of the naturalization process when one could simply pop out citizens without it?

The question is important to be asked within the framework of Gypsies born in the US being considered US citizens, as discussed in debate for the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and also debate surrounding the 14th Amendment (specifically the Citizenship Clause). Gypsies were specifically mentioned in both debates.

As noted before, Gypsies had no permanent domicile. They had no allegiance to the US. During the debates in 1866 it was acknowledged that children born to Gypsies would be US citizens. That needs to be squared against the naturalization process that existed at the time.

So, a work in progress. But not to AJ Scalia - enacted text was the important consideration, legislative intent was like pulling on a ball of yarn.

142 posted on 04/22/2026 2:26:58 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: Fury

On no planet is this a good idea pic.twitter.com/XiTNSPadJR— Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) April 23, 2026


145 posted on 04/23/2026 7:28:52 AM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson