[ClearCase_guy]

I think we need to work on an AI system to serve as part of the Justice system.

Feed in the relevant laws, as determined by both attorneys.
Feed in the relevant evidence, as determined by both attorneys.

Was a law violated?
Did the plaintiff violate that law?

An AI system can determine these things very cleanly.

Have a judge review the decision by the AI. Is the AI system biased? Is it hallucinating? The judge could possibly overturn the AI decision. But if the judge is doing so only because of his own personal bias, he should risk being removed from the bench.

I think that, at least since OJ, if not before, we have determined that humans cannot be trusted to make decisions in our justice system. So let’s try something else.

[neverevergiveup]

I think that, at least since OJ, if not before, we have determined that humans cannot be trusted to make decisions in our justice system.

Anyone who has had any interactions with the justice system knows that to an uncomfortable extent whether justice gets done is a crap shoot. I have never been to a trial as a defendant in anything, but based upon what I've seen and know I would be terrified - because I don't think the system works. We've all heard of 'show-trials', but the reality is that all trials are a show. It's pathetic.

[Leaning Right]

> I think we need to work on an AI system to serve as part of the Justice system. <

I’ve read of a proposal to use professional jurors. We have professional judges. So why not professional jurors also?

And also eliminate the unanimous verdict requirement. That would minimize the impact of one crazy juror.

I’m not saying I agree with all that. Just something to think about.

[oldtech]

I don’t know much about AI, except that it can be deceiving. I don’t think we want that mixed up in the justice system.