|
Posted on 03/31/2026 9:24:51 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Nice post! 👌
Swalwell just stepped down
Gonzales leaving right behind
Swamp will drain itself
This is incredible what the government did to this doctor. I had never heard about this case until now.
Go to 53 min. mark for start of his segment. It is about 20 minutes.
Dr. Ron Elfenbein—a celebrated emergency physician—went on national television to criticize Biden’s halt of monoclonal antibodies. A few months later, Biden’s DOJ indicted him and sought 50 years in federal prison allegedly over a $150 billing discrepancy that Dr. Elfenbein says he didn’t even code. He joins Dr. Drew to expose how the federal government and Biden admin used emergency powers to financially ruin and silence dissenting medical experts.
https://rumble.com/v77yzla-strakas-6am-fbi-raid-and-the-doctor-facing-50-years-for-defying-biden-w-sea.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a_s_a%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a
oops
second line should read...
Gonzales leaves right behind
Haiku error.
I’m loving the vaxx related links. ThankQ!
We asked our daughter if we could live in her basement ADU while we search for a house. She thought about it for weeks and her reticence was based on her worry I would make her husband, who has asthma and is fully vaxxed, sick. She wants me to get vaxxed. Or I can just test before brief visits.
She sent me CDC studies saying the vaxx is safe for someone who’s had cancer.
We’ve decided to live in our trailer while we look for a house.
Money is the engine of politics... 🤷 Steyer is a V-16!
We need to see Steyer crash like a V2.
https://x.com/CptAllenHistory/status/2043867222339162509
The systematic extermination of the Jews began, not with gas, but with the “Holocaust by Bullets” via mobile death squads called Einsatzgruppen that followed the German army into the Soviet Union. And the Allies knew about it from minute one.
On June 22, 1941, Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa and invaded the USSR. Five days earlier, Reinhard Heydrich briefed the commanders of the Einsatzgruppen on their mission: follow the Wehrmacht and murder every Jew they could find.
In village after village and town after town, they dragged Jews from their homes, marched them to pits or ravines, forced them to dig their own graves, and shot them. Men first.
Then, from August 1941 onward, all women, children, and even infants too.
Local antisemites, particularly from Lithuania, Ukraine and Latvia, often enthusiastically collaborated and even joined in on the mass slaughter of the Jews.
And the level of bloodthirsty butchery was truly savage.
Babies were torn from mothers’ arms and shot or smashed against trees. Entire families were machine-gunned into ditches. Jews were forced to watch their loved ones die before their own turn came. Germans experimented with lining Jews up two, three, four Jews at a time and trying to shoot them all through the neck with a single bullet. It was sick sport.
Nothing about the Einsatzgruppen’s “mission” was “war.” This was industrialized extermination with pistols, shovels, and some of the most sadistic mass human behavior ever recorded.
By the end of 1941, the Einsatzgruppen had murdered more than 1 million Jews.
By December of 1941, the Nazis began their first large-scale gassings using mobile gas vans at Chelmno, the first extermination camp. More death camps followed with Belzec (March 1942), Auschwitz II (March 1942) Sobibor (May 1942), and Treblinka (July 1942).
But the Einsatzgruppen kept on killing. Gassing would become the main method of extermination by the Summer of 1942.
Current estimates (especially following the groundbreaking work of Father Patrick Desbois’ Yahad-In Unum project) place the total number of Jews murdered just by the Einsatzgrupppen by war’s end at between 1.5-2 million.
Now, here’s the part almost no one talks about: the Allies knew about the extermination campaign against the Jews almost immediately.
British codebreakers at Bletchley Park were reading the Germans’ own radio traffic in real time, and the Einsatzgruppen and Order Police sent daily tallies back to Berlin that included the exact numbers of Jews shot in specific towns and villages (the recordings got sloppier as time went on with some going unreported - especially those carried out by local collaborators instead of Germans).
Every detailed report sent back to Berlin was intercepted and deciphered by the British within days, and sometimes within mere hours, of the mass killings.
That’s right. The Allies had precise, irrefutable intelligence on the “Holocaust by Bullets” from the very first days of the invasion in June of 1941.
And yet, the Allies refused to name what the Germans were doing publicly. They buried the reports. They spoke only in vague terms about “atrocities” or “Nazi brutality.” They never highlighted that this was a deliberate campaign to exterminate the Jewish people. The Allies knew their efforts could lose support if it was seen as a “Jewish war.”
And so, there was no public declaration, there were no urgent warnings to Jewish communities, and there were no serious efforts to reverse the illegal White Paper of 1939 that closed British Mandate Palestine to further Jewish immigration.
The horror was known to the Allies and was deliberately downplayed.
Why? The answer was always the same: saving the Jews wasn’t a “military priority,” only “winning the war” was a military priority.
Regardless, it is historical fact that the systematic murder of Jews began in June 1941, and the free world looked away.
So, Jews take it seriously when people and groups and countries threaten to and try to once again annihilate us. And now that we are a sovereign people again, we don’t have to rely on foreign codebreakers, foreign politicians, and foreign generals to decide whether we live or die. Now, we like having friends, but we ultimately defend ourselves.
Qne of his most informative podcasts, explains much.
From the 10 min mark detailing Sunny Navqi lies, all the
way to the end on the 17th amendment in 3882b portion.
Excerpt from X22 website (much missing see source):
Today, Trump controls Iran, the [DS] fell right into the trap and Iran has no way out of what Trump has done to them. He never wanted to have a ground invasion or regime change, he wanted control of the energy, the Strait and he has it.
This is much bigger than people can imagine, Trump is taking down the [DS] system globally, the structure is behind destroyed. The system that the [DS] created is all around us, it is the money laundering, Epstein, trafficking of humans, religion, red cross, politicians etc and it is being dismantled piece by piece. Trump has the leverage, ask yourself, why is the [DS] panicking over Iran?
Economy
Chinese investments and construction contracts in Iran have reached $25 billion. Meanwhile, Middle East trade with China has more than doubled since 2017, to $317 billion in 2024. That is nearly 4 times the $85 billion in trade with the US in 2024. China is heavily tied to the Middle East’s economy.
Meanwhile, the S&P 500 is down less than -0.5% today after rising +5% prior to negotiations on hopes of a peace deal. The reality is that investors are preparing for prolonged inflation and the acceleration of the AI Revolution. Own assets or be left behind.
The Strait of Hormuz is the pressure point because control of that corridor shapes the cost of movement, the pricing of risk, and the financial architecture built downstream of global energy flow… In that sense, Iran is the visible proxy while the real signal travels far beyond Tehran and into the transnational machinery that long governed passage through managed instability and silent extraction… When sovereign power retakes the sea gates, the old order loses one of its deepest control mechanisms, and the legal-financial channels beneath commerce begin shifting back into a different hands…
Treasury, IRS Propose Rules For 1 Percent Remittance Tax On Some Money Sent To Foreign Countries
The Internal Revenue Service and the Department of the Treasury proposed regulations on Friday regarding the new excise tax, established under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, on certain remittances made abroad.
“Beginning Jan. 1, 2026, a 1 percent remittance transfer tax applies to remittances sent from the United States to recipients in foreign countries when the sender provides cash, a money order, a cashier’s check, or other similar physical instrument to the remittance transfer provider,” the IRS said in an April 10 statement.
“The sender is liable for the tax, and remittance transfer providers are required to collect the remittance transfer tax from certain senders, make semimonthly deposits, and file quarterly returns with the IRS. If the remittance transfer provider does not collect the tax from the sender, the tax becomes a liability of the remittance transfer provider.”
The proposed regulations clarify how the remittance transfer tax would be applied.
There are roughly 600 money services businesses licensed as money transmitters in the United States, out of which more than 200 operate through around 500,000 authorized agents, the IRS said, citing data from the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System.
Between 2019 and 2024, money transfers to domestic and foreign destinations via money services businesses increased from $1.3 to $4 trillion.
“Money transmitted to foreign destinations (remittance transfers) accounted for 9 to 25 percent of the total money transmissions, equaling $236 billion in 2019, growing to almost $1 trillion in 2021 and 2022, but decreasing to $365 billion in 2024,” the notice said.
God is not distracted by a multitude of things.
Nor can we be.
Meister Eckhart
So the murder of Jews by Nazis was not something we later discovered. Interesting.
Gotta be Tom Steyer... 🤔 😉 4 accusers? That costs money💰. At least one accuser totally lacks credibility. But no proof is needed now.
Swallwell is tiny
and had to force his romance.
He is pitiful.
Perhaps the dam is finally breaking. Congress is so filled with filth - it is a swamp! Rumors have been that the lid is rattling from the boiling in the pot! 👈 It is long overdue! ✅
Great post about the shooting holocaust in Germany, should be mandatory reading on Gab, jus sayn
Great post about the shooting holocaust in Germany, should be mandatory reading on Gab, jus sayn...
Agree....only....it should be mandatory reading in ALL US SCHOOLS!!
👌👌👌 Roger that! ❗ I tell you, ever since that blood moon Purim ('lots' - Jewish - Book of Esther) we are seeing reversal after reversal! The Lord of Hosts is moving! Buckle in...
Inactive Isn’t Removed — And Florida Just Showed Us Why That Matters
Federal law says states “shall remove” ineligible voters from the rolls. So why are millions of them still sitting there — and why did Florida just make the problem worse?
https://krisjurski.substack.com/p/inactive-isnt-removed-and-florida
************************************************
Imagine this. You move from Florida to Tennessee. You buy a house. You get a Tennessee driver’s license. You register to vote in your new county. You’re a responsible citizen — so you call your old county back in Florida and ask them to take your name off their voter rolls.
They ignore you.
You write a letter. Nothing.
You call again. The clerk tells you that you have to fill out some form — but they’re not sure which one. You ask them to email it. They don’t.
Two years later, you’re still on the voter rolls in a county where you no longer live, in a state where you can no longer legally vote. And nobody seems to care.
This isn’t a hypothetical. We’ve now heard from hundreds of Americans who tell us essentially the same story. They moved. They tried to do the right thing. Their old county simply refused to act.
Here’s the part that should make every American angry: federal law required that county to act. They didn’t have a choice. There is no decision to make. There is no local, county or state ordinance that over rules that.
In 1993, Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act — the NVRA. Most people know it as the “Motor Voter” law because it let people register to vote at the DMV. Buried inside that same law is a much less famous section that puts a hard, mandatory duty on every state in the country.
It’s called Section 8. And here’s the language that matters, in plain English:
Every state shall conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters — by reason of death, or change of residence.
Read that one more time. Notice the word “shall.” In legal writing, “shall” doesn’t mean “should” or “if you get around to it.” It means must. It is a command, not a suggestion.
And notice the other word: “remove.”
Not “flag.” Not “mark inactive.” Not “set aside for later.” Remove.
Nine years later, in 2002, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act — HAVA — and used the exact same word again: states must make a “reasonable effort to remove registrants who are ineligible to vote.”
Here’s the trick. Federal law uses the word ineligible. But many counties use a different word: inactive.
These two words sound similar. They are not the same thing.
Ineligible is a legal status. It means a person no longer meets the requirements to be registered at that address. Maybe they died. Maybe they moved. Maybe they were never a citizen. Federal law says ineligible voters must be removed.
Inactive is an administrative label. It means the county has some reason to think the registration might be stale, but they haven’t done anything about it yet. The voter is still on the rolls. They can still receive mail. In many states, they can still request a ballot.
Federal law tells counties to remove ineligible voters. Many counties have decided, on their own, to mark them “inactive” instead — and then leave them sitting there. For years. Sometimes forever.
Those who were ineligible at the time of their registration, but were incorrectly granted voting privileges in error, are still ineligible, and should be removed immediately upon discovery. Examples include: registering with information on their application that is incorrect or registering an address that doesn’t exist.
This is the inactive shell game. It lets a county claim, with a straight face, that they’re “managing” their voter rolls — while not doing what federal law actually requires.
Also in Florida, it means Supervisors of Elections (SOEs) can ask for more of your tax money since their budgets are derived by the size of their voter rolls. This means Florida SOEs are incentivized to keep their voter rolls bloated.
The NVRA did create a legitimate use for “inactive” status: it’s supposed to be a short, temporary holding spot during a 30-day notice process. After two federal general elections — about two years and a week, at most — an unresponsive inactive voter is supposed to be removed entirely. But somewhere along the way, “temporary” became “permanent” database to “park” a voter registration for possible future use.
The NVRA explicitly says that if a registrant gives written confirmation that they’ve moved out of the jurisdiction, the county can remove them — immediately. No 90-day waiting period. No multiple letters. No “wet signature” on the county’s own form or card. Done.
It also says counties must conduct a general program — meaning they have to go looking for these voters, not wait for the voters to find them. The Election Assistance Commission, which is the federal agency that helps states comply with these laws, specifically encourages counties to use data sources like:
USPS National Change of Address records
State and federal death records
Cross-state voter registration matching
EAC has been experimenting for several years, and a number of counties are already using proprietary data sources such as credit card agencies.
If a county isn’t using these tools — or worse, has the data and is ignoring it — that county is not making a “reasonable effort.” That’s a direct violation of federal law.
.....On April 1, 2026, Governor Ron DeSantis signed Florida’s version of the SAVE Act, House Bill 991. The headlines praised it as a major election integrity win, requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.
That part is good.
But buried in Florida law — and left untouched by HB 991 — is a provision in Florida Statute § 98.065 that should make every Florida voter sit up. Under existing Florida law, an “inactive” voter can stop their own removal from the rolls by doing one of three things:
Updating their registration
Showing up to vote in person
Requesting a vote-by-mail ballot
Stop and think about that third one for a moment.
Florida TODAY has nearly 2.7 MILLION inactive registrations on it’s voter rolls. That means 1 in every 5 registrations in our voter rolls is currently INACTIVE.
Now picture a sophisticated bad actor. They pull the public voter file. They filter for inactive registrations. They identify thousands of people who are Inactive, not voted for 3 or more federal elections, and then check the NCOA to see if they moved away. They update the mailing address - which changes the status to Active - to an address they have access to, ... like a UPS Personal Mail Box rented four months prior to an election under a fictitious name and address.
The request itself resets the removal clock under Florida law, which means the registration stays alive on the rolls — ready to be exploited again next election. And because the real voter has no idea this is happening, there’s no one to complain.
This is not a theoretical concern. This is a textbook identity theft scheme, sitting in plain sight, made possible by the gap between what federal law requires (removal) and what counties actually do (its easier: just mark Inactive and ignore).
The same Florida law that just cracked down on noncitizen registration left a wide-open back door for ballot fraud against Inactive voters. One hand giveth., the other hand left the screen door unlatched.
The fix is not complicated, and it does not require new laws. It requires counties to do what existing federal law has required them to do for the last 33 years:
Use the data. NCOA records, death records, and cross-state matches already exist. The information is sitting there.
Stop hiding behind “inactive.” The NVRA says remove. Not relabel.
Stop hiding behind “wet signature.” When the apply to vote elsewhere, a driver’s license, public benefits, homestead tax exemption, their wet signature is put on the application, serving as a legal attestation of their new permanent address.
Honor written requests. When a voter who has moved asks to be removed for the voter roll, federal law says you can do it that day. So, do it that day.
Close the mail-ballot loophole. A registration that is stale enough to be “inactive” should not be eligible to receive a mail ballot to an address where the voter no longer lives. Period.
.....
Voyageurs National Park, International Falls, Kabetogama, Ash River, and Crane Lake, MN
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
