[fwdude]

So, now it's "extreme" and "harsh" to not allow men in women's private, intimate spaces.

They expect us to believe this.

[The_Media_never_lie]

Using common sense is harsh and extreme now. /s

[lee martell]

Replace the adjective ‘extreme’ with ‘logical’ and you got a deal!

[P-Marlowe]

I love Idaho!!

[fwdude]

The left is promoting testimonies of the very few super masculine transgender “men” (women on mega-doses of testosterone) to make the exception the rule.

Actually, the rule that they want is for unconvincing “transgender women” (men) to be allowed into women’s spaces unhindered. That’s what this law is seeking to address.

[Uncle Miltie]

Men with penises belong in the Men’s Room regardless of their dresses or mental illnesses.

[rktman]

😂👍

[dagunk]

Well - I dunno about this one.

Felony? OK that’s pretty harsh.

Daddy following the transgender who followed Daddy’s little girl into the bathroom? The transgender might leave on a stretcher - permanently crippled - or in a body bag.

I like the second option.

[Wuli]

It should be a civil offense with a fine, not a criminal offense, except after X number of repeated violations and then starting as a misdemeanor before escalating to a felony and the law has to acknowledge whether or not it was the policy of the owner of the restroom to allow “gender identity” to determine someone’s bathroom. Before criminalizing the “trans” person, they need to legally ban “public accommodation” practices where establishments allow “gender identity” to determine a “trans” persons choice of restroom. If establishments cannot make such allowances, they have a legal incentive to prevent the practice or face fines and penalties.

[NetAddicted]

I haven’t read article yet, but does bill specify that young boys can go in women’s restroom with their mom’s, like kids under 5?