To: Miami Rebel
So bombing them back to the stone age wasn’t enough of a deterrence? I vote no for boots on the ground. Too risky.
8 posted on
03/26/2026 12:36:15 PM PDT by
OrangeHoof
("Our property is protected by two pitbulls. They love visitors, especially with marinara or garlic.")
To: OrangeHoof
Actually, if we bombed them to the Stone Age, we’d be bombing them forward in time.
12 posted on
03/26/2026 12:37:57 PM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. )
To: OrangeHoof
I don't think any conflict was won by strategic bombing alone.
I don't want "boots on the ground" unless they are Iranian boots. If they are
too lazy to fight for their own country, why should Americans die for them?
47 posted on
03/26/2026 1:57:40 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
To: OrangeHoof
I don't think any conflict was won by strategic bombing alone.
I don't want "boots on the ground" unless they are Iranian boots. If they are
too lazy to fight for their own country, why should Americans die for them?
48 posted on
03/26/2026 1:57:41 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
To: OrangeHoof
Risky? Did you ever serve. Risk comes with the job.
70 posted on
03/26/2026 8:08:20 PM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn. .. )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson