Posted on 03/26/2026 1:23:42 AM PDT by Morgana
As a first-time mom expecting a baby this September, my social media feed has completely changed. What used to be filled with news and politics is now full of pregnancy advice, nursery ideas, and – of course – ads for diapers.
However, I didn’t expect that preparing for my baby would lead me to discover something deeply disturbing about the diaper industry.
Like most parents, I assumed choosing a diaper brand would come down to comfort, quality, and price. The last thing I expected was to learn that many of the most recognizable diaper brands in America have publicly aligned themselves with the abortion industry.
But the more I looked into it, the worse it got.
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Procter & Gamble – the company behind Pampers and Luvs – expanded employee healthcare coverage to include travel for abortions. Meanwhile, Kimberly-Clark, the manufacturer of Huggies, has been matching employee contributions to Planned Parenthood for two decades.
Other companies have taken similar positions. The Honest Company has also pledged to ensure employees can access an abortion “regardless of where they live,” including transportation to another state. Hello Bello has promised to help cover costs and provide paid time off for employees travelling for an abortion.
Even newer premium diaper brands have weighed in. After the Roe decision, Coterie publicly posted that it felt “lost” without abortion access and framed abortion as essential to reproductive freedom.
As a mom-to-be, discovering this wasn’t just surprising – it was deeply unsettling.
I’m currently carrying a child I already love more than words can describe. Every doctor’s appointment and ultrasound remind me that life is not abstract. It’s precious. It’s a miracle.
When you’ve seen your baby move on a screen and heard their heartbeat, abortion stops being a political talking point. It becomes a question of protecting a human life.
The irony is impossible to ignore. These companies exist because babies exist, yet many have chosen to support organizations dedicated to ending unborn lives.
Companies built on babies shouldn’t be funding the destruction of unborn life.
Parents want to make the best choices for their children. But most have no idea that the diaper brands they rely on are also taking strong political positions about abortion.
And that’s where the dilemma begins.
Because diapers aren’t optional. Every parent needs them.
Discovering that so many major brands support abortion leaves pro-life parents facing a dilemma they should never have to face: whether buying a basic necessity for their baby also means supporting an industry that destroys life.
That is why alternatives matter. EveryLife, for example, has positioned itself as an explicitly pro-life diaper company and supports Pregnancy Resource Centers. It may not yet be as widely available in stores as the major brands, but its existence shows that parents are not wrong for wanting baby products that align with their values.
Choosing to become a parent means protecting life, nurturing it, and fighting for it.
That’s why this issue matters so deeply – and why the work of the ACLJ matters right now.
While massive corporations and powerful advocacy groups continue pushing abortion access as a “right,” the ACLJ is actively fighting to defund Planned Parenthood, battling a taxpayer-funded smear campaign against pro-life centers, and preserving pro-life laws nationwide.
The fight for life didn’t end with the fall of Roe v. Wade. In many ways, it has only intensified.
But people are still willing to take up that fight.
Because every child deserves to be protected.
LifeNews Note: This article was written by Erin Mills, ACLJ Social Media Manager.
The enemy within, or perhaps paying tribute?
The “message” is more important than money to these people.
They support aborting white kids and replacing them with illegals.
I suspect those are some of the family planning methods the Planned Parenthood and others provide.
Target, for instance, kicked the Salvation Army off their premises in 2004, with virtually no dip in stock price. They got spanked by the market when they started letting trans women in their dressing rooms in 2016 and stock dipped a few points, but customers soon came back. Then they went all in on Pride and trans-wear for babies in 2023. Social media went wild, but stock actually went up before it eventually took a hit; stock price is still trending somewhat downward two years later, but customers keep coming back. Here's an interactive timeline:
Probably the same as to MAGA people, who have been patient with lack of improvement in costs of living, except for lower egg prices now that bird flu is being controlled somehow.
I wonder if when people get too poor to buy disposable diapers from having several little ones in diapers they revert to cloth diapers and washing them since they can no longer manage a day job and multiple small children. More time to do laundry and care for children with no job. Also the opportunities to work have been improved by exporting many low wage immigrant baby sitters, if you want to earn extra money by baby sitting an extra child or two while staying home with your own flock.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.