It was appropriate for Trump to mention the tariffs in front of Congress because they have the power to .reverse SCOTUS’ decision with legislation. SCOTUS just happened to be there.
Amy Conehead is what she is, a disappointment to conservatives, who wanted more that someone a little better than RBG on the court. She represents what is wrong with judges coming from academic positions at ABA law school, but who consistently miss the big picture, and so resort to cutesy opinions.
Yes, she's "little better than RBG...". Good grief.
AJ Barrett has been in the majority on multiple landmark decisions:
Free exercise of religion (Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, 2021)
And religious schools eligible for state funding (Carson v. Makin, 2022)...
And gun rights (NY State Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. Bruen, 2022)...
And affirmative action (Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard/UNC, 2023)...
And Chevron deference (Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 2024)...
And presidential immunity (Trump v. United States, 2024)...
AJ Barrett is a stickler on cases being fully briefed, meaning in part that they work their way through the appellate system. That irritates some people for sure.