Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 02/22/2026 5:45:11 PM PST by SeekAndFind
China’s humanoid robots were once a punchline. Now they are a warning shot.
Just one year after drawing global skepticism for awkward stumbles and mechanical breakdowns, Chinese-made humanoid robots are performing backflips, executing kung fu routines and delivering synchronized gymnastics on the world’s biggest television stage. The dramatic turnaround has reignited debate about China’s manufacturing edge, the future of work and the accelerating U.S.–China technology race.
Here is what investors need to know.
China’s annual Spring Festival Gala is widely regarded as the most-watched television program in the world. This year, humanoid robots from leading Chinese startups took center stage, performing choreographed dances, martial arts routines and complex acrobatics.
The contrast from last year was stark. In 2025, earlier iterations of the machines appeared unstable and limited. Public demonstrations including a widely publicized robot marathon drew headlines for falls, crashes and technical hiccups.
Fast forward twelve months and the tone has shifted. Social media clips from this year’s gala spread globally within hours. Viewers reacted with a mix of admiration and unease. Admiration for the engineering leap. Unease about what rapid automation could mean for labor markets and geopolitical competition.
Reyk Knuhtsen, analyst at SemiAnalysis, told CNBC:
“People should absolutely be taking these robots seriously.”
“After this spring gala demonstration, they’re becoming visibly more lean, fluid, and capable.”
He added:
“As we watch them push the physical boundaries humans are capable of, it becomes apparent they can achieve human-level actions, and eventually superhuman-level performances.”
That is not hype. That is an analyst warning the market that something structural is happening.
China’s dominance in humanoid robotics is not a fluke. It is the product of decades of industrial policy, vertical integration and scale manufacturing.
According to estimates cited by Barclays analysts, roughly 15,000 humanoid robots were installed globally in 2025. More than 85 percent of those installations occurred in China. The United States accounted for roughly 13 percent.
Zornitsa Todorova, Head of Thematic FICC Research at Barclays, told CNBC:
“The fundamental advantage that China has is a nearly vertically integrated robotics value chain: from the rare earths and high-performance magnets to the physical components, and the batteries.”
That vertical integration matters. Rare earth elements, high-performance motors, advanced battery systems and precision manufacturing are all critical to humanoid robotics. China dominates each layer.
In simple terms, China controls much of the supply chain from raw materials to final assembly. That gives it cost leverage and speed.
One of the most prominent companies featured at the gala was Unitree. The startup has become a symbol of China’s rapid robotics ascent.
Unitree advertises a base price of approximately $13,500 for its G1 humanoid robot. That number alone has sent shockwaves through the industry.
For comparison, Tesla is developing its Optimus humanoid robot. CEO Elon Musk said during a January 2025 earnings call that production costs for Optimus could eventually fall below $20,000 if annual output reaches 1 million units. Final pricing would depend on demand and scale.
That is a meaningful gap.
Lower pricing expands potential use cases in logistics, manufacturing, retail and even household assistance. It also accelerates adoption in emerging markets that may not tolerate premium robotics pricing.
Unitree’s CEO reportedly told local media that the company expects between 10,000 and 20,000 shipments in 2026. If achieved, that would represent a significant scaling milestone in a market still in early commercialization.
The viral kung fu flips make for compelling video. But investors should look deeper.
Omdia chief analyst Lian Jye Su noted that while the gala performance showed impressive dexterity, humanoid robots must prove themselves in messy, unstructured environments.
“The enhanced dexterity shown in routines like aerial flips and weapon handling signals strong potential for economic impact in physically demanding tasks that involve delicate tool handling and precise movements,” Su told CNBC.
“However, they still need to prove reliability in unstructured, human-centric environments for delicate tasks like healthcare or household assistance.”
In other words, dancing on stage is controlled. Real-world deployment is not.
Robots must navigate cluttered spaces, interpret ambiguous instructions and interact safely with humans. That requires more than mechanical engineering. It requires advanced AI models capable of reasoning, task planning and chaining actions over long time horizons.
Knuhtsen emphasized this point bluntly:
“[T]he AI model race is still undecided, and that will be the defining factor in the end, as the robot will only be as useful as its model.”
This is where the next phase of competition intensifies. Physical hardware is increasingly commoditized. AI capability will determine long-term economic value.
China’s robotics sector benefits not only from manufacturing scale but also from coordinated government support. Robotics is a strategic priority under Beijing’s industrial modernization plans, with funding flowing into research labs, universities and startup ecosystems.
The goal is clear: dominate intelligent manufacturing and automation.
That ambition intersects with the broader U.S.–China technology rivalry, particularly in AI and advanced semiconductors. While the United States leads in cutting-edge AI model development and advanced chip design, China is leveraging scale manufacturing and applied engineering.
For investors, this raises key questions:
The robotics race is not isolated. It is tied to semiconductors, rare earths, batteries and AI infrastructure.
The anxiety around humanoid robots is not theoretical.
China is already facing demographic challenges, including a shrinking workforce and an aging population. Automation is seen as a solution to labor shortages in manufacturing and logistics.
If humanoid robots achieve cost-effective deployment, they could begin replacing repetitive, physically demanding jobs. Warehouses, assembly lines and service roles are obvious early targets.
In developed markets, labor unions and policymakers are watching closely. The conversation is shifting from “Can robots do this?” to “When will they do this at scale?”
For investors, sectors exposed to physical labor costs may face margin pressure if competitors adopt robotics aggressively. On the other hand, robotics suppliers, AI software providers and advanced component manufacturers could see multi-year growth tailwinds.
U.S. humanoid manufacturers are expected to ramp production this year, but analysts suggest they face headwinds.
Omdia’s Su said:
“Other markets will ramp up but likely lag due to China’s established supply chains and production scale.”
The United States still holds strong advantages in foundational AI research, advanced chip design and software platforms. Companies developing large language models and robotics-specific AI frameworks may ultimately control the intelligence layer that powers these machines.
The critical question is integration. The winner may not be the company that builds the most impressive robot on stage. It may be the one that pairs reliable hardware with best-in-class reasoning models and scalable cloud infrastructure.
Here are the signals that matter:
A year ago, China’s humanoid robots were a curiosity. Today, they are a strategic signal.
The rapid improvement from viral stumbles to fluid kung fu routines highlights more than engineering progress. It demonstrates China’s ability to iterate quickly at scale.
But the race is not decided.
Manufacturing scale gives China a head start. AI capability may determine the finish line. The companies that combine affordable hardware with powerful, reliable AI models will define the next wave of automation.
Investors ignoring this space risk missing one of the most important industrial transformations of the decade.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The question of whether Chinese robot videos are “fake” or “marketing magic” is complex because the answer depends on which specific video you are watching.
While some viral clips are indeed CGI or staged, the most recent high-profile displays from 2025 and 2026 are widely verified as real hardware, albeit operating under very specific conditions.
Videos showing squads of robots in snow-covered mountains firing machine guns with perfect accuracy have been debunked as 100% CGI. Fact-checkers (such as DW in early 2026) noted inconsistencies like magazines disappearing into thin air and lighting that doesn’t match the environment.
Many “impressive” interactions where a robot speaks perfectly or performs delicate tasks (like folding laundry or making coffee) often use teleoperation. A human operator wears a VR headset and haptic gloves, and the robot mirrors their movements in real-time.
Companies like Xpeng and Tesla (with Optimus) have faced criticism for not being transparent about when a human is “driving” the robot. In late 2025, Xpeng’s “Iron” robot was accused of being a human in a suit due to its hyper-realistic movement, though the company later proved it was a machine—just one being controlled via teleoperation.
However, The “dancing” and “gymnastics” videos you see from companies like Unitree (H1 and G1) and AgiBot are largely real hardware using advanced Reinforcement Learning (RL).
During the recent Lunar New Year, dozens of Unitree G1 robots performed synchronized Kung Fu and backflips. These were real robots, but they were performing scripted choreography.
These robots aren’t “thinking” about their dance moves; they are running an AI model that has practiced those specific movements millions of times in a computer simulation. If you pushed one mid-dance, it might fall, but its “reflexes” to stay upright are real and autonomous.
And You may have seen videos of engineers kicking or shoving robots (like the Unitree G1). These are generally unscripted and real. The robot’s ability to “catch” itself and not fall over is the current “gold standard” of real-world robotics.
great then turn off the water to your house, that one thing alone would keep you busy enough and tired enough to sleep well.
Probably fake robots just like everything else in China
The idea is to have the robots CONTROL the humans.
“They cannot quickly go from picking up an eggshell to squeezing a lemon.”
“Will they become companion and sex dolls as well?”
I think we should consult Robert Plant to answer this question.
It’s getting cheaper to eat every meal out than buy and cook your own food. I do our family food budget. I spend 15 hours a week shopping, cleaning up and actually cooking. I value that time at $15/hr. So labor alone is $225/wk.
I predict future houses will not have kitchens.
In 1,000 BC, if you thought about what life would be like 100 years in the future the answer was “more of the same.”
That was true for the next 2800 years. The future was always more of the same.
Then the Renaissance, the Industrial Revolution, the invention of calculus, the knowledge of thermodynamics, materials science, the scientific method, division of labor, modern management, and many more all came together over a few hundred years such that “more of the same” was no longer true. Things greatly accelerated with the invention of central power stations and the long distance transmission of electricity; RF communications; computers; and optical communications.
We are on the cusp of something as big as all that. It is impossible to even contemplate what will be in 100 years.
I want one that trims the grass along the fence with a weed eater and can maintain the weed eater, picks up limbs in the yard, loads leaves in the tractor leaf bucket, sweeps the barn and rakes the gravel in the barnyard and storage buildings, trims grass along the ponds and maybe even mows? Cleaning toilets, washing dishes, dusting and other light house work would also be nice.
If it can do those things it would be worth every penny of $13,500.
“China’s $13,500 Humanoid Robots Are Changing the Global AI Battle”
hmmmm ... i might think about buying a couple when Harbor Freight sells them ...
Does MOYA have an”only-fans” page?
Asking for a friend...
I agree with everything you say except:
“many of us have less free time than previous generations”
Too much free time IS the problem.
ESPN “Kung FU Robot Wars”
Sponsored by gambleonline.com.
Place your bets!
>> China’s dominance in humanoid robotics is not a fluke. It is the product of decades of industrial policy, vertical integration and scale manufacturing.
Other factors include decades of sending droves of ChiComs to learn in our best universities, as well as plundering the intellectual property of the western industrial world.
>> It is impossible to even contemplate what will be in 100 years.
A smoking nuclear war hellscape is one possibility.
The return of our Lord is another.
Both of those close together could happen.
We don’t know, do we?
Tempting isn’t she?
Interesting that they made her look Caucasian instead of Chinese.
This was an interesting piece one of my news sites picked up on the other day. I’m not saying it’s accurate, but it’s possible, and therefore interesting.
https://www.thewisewolf.club/p/why-elon-musk-said-ai-is-the-demon
“We are on the cusp of something as big as all that. It is impossible to even contemplate what will be in 100 years.”
Yep! The “brave new world” will be upon us soon.
>> I’m not saying it’s accurate, but it’s possible, and therefore interesting.
Understood.
I attended a lecture by an AI communications guru — I’ll characterize him that way — who is receiving concerns from the caliber of the guys mentioned in the piece you quoted. One thing he mentioned: there exist people who believe that a) the end game of transhumanism WILL in fact be the destruction of all humanity by the transhumans, and b) even as we die out WE SHOULD BE PROUD that we are participating in the “evolution” of humans to transhumans that are greater than us.
Now THAT concept is, to me, chilling to the bone! But it won’t happen. Because Creator GOD (not the “monk in the void”) is real, and He is on His throne.
In Pompeii, nearly 2000 years ago many of the smaller houses didn’t have kitchens. They ate at local cafés, the Roman equivalent of fast food.
CC
Oh I believe it, for sure. It's the fundamental plot is so many movies, that wouldn't have been so popular if people didn't believe there was at least a shred of truth to the concern. There's so many angles too, as to whether the conflict is between man and machine, man and man machine hybrid, man and genetically modified man, etc.
But there are so many humans, now, urging these conflicts to appear in the name of technology, it's as you said scary. I saw something the other day about how MRNA has completely taken over the entire vaccine market now. And even though they know the technology can maim and kill people, those negative results are simply considered collateral damage, as they believe our species must cull off those whose bodies cannot handle the injections. So gene editing is apparently the future, whether we want it or not. This was not a conspiracy site, it was a medical professional who didn't put it in those terms, of course, but that was his message!
So these technology changes are beyond our control, and the people controlling them may not have mankind's overall interest at heart, but rather only their own selfish interest at heart. Therefore as you know it is imperative that we not put our faith in man, or machines, but only in the Heavenly Father, and let Him show us the way, every day of our lives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.