Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

The FACE Act (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 248, is a federal law enacted in 1994 that prohibits violence, threats, intimidation, and property damage targeting individuals seeking or providing reproductive health services, as well as individuals at places of religious worship—the law is enforced by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation and carries criminal penalties including up to 11 years imprisonment for violent conduct and fines up to $250,000.

The Department of Justice has filed more than 15 FACE actions in more than a dozen states since the law’s enactment, demonstrating federal commitment to protecting constitutional rights and public safety at covered facilities.


3 posted on 01/20/2026 12:18:07 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Democrats seek power through cheating and assassination. They are sociopaths. They just want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

They passed that law to squelch Pro-Life rescuers. The Communists and radicals would love to start storming the churches and one wonders what they’re thinking now.


22 posted on 01/20/2026 12:29:26 PM PST by MDLION ("Trust in the Lord with all your heart" -Proverbs 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
The FACE Act (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 248, is a federal law enacted in 1994 that prohibits violence, threats, intimidation, and property damage targeting individuals seeking or providing reproductive health services, as well as individuals at places of religious worship—the law is enforced by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation and carries criminal penalties including up to 11 years imprisonment for violent conduct and fines up to $250,000.

The question to ask is, "Would a reasonable person, especially an unarmed or elderly person, or a family with children, have been threatened?" That gets you to disturbing the peace, and menacing, which is clearly what was actually going on and was the clear intent. It certainly wasn't political persuasion.

90 posted on 01/20/2026 2:23:48 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson