To: fr_freak
Candace’s approach is to put part of one white board with pins and string and pictures of people...
and then move to the next wall and its white board and put up some more pins and string and pictures of people...
The whole point of the exercise is to link everything together.
She does not tie everything together.
She leaves it hanging there.
Innuendo.
Hints.
Maybes.
That is sleazy—leaves it to the audience to draw their own conclusion—when she has teed it up for them.
Then she can say—See I didn’t accuse Erika of child trafficking.
My answer—lady—then what was this video about exactly?
I would love to see a “Better Call Saul” junkyard dog libel plaintiff attorney rip into her in court. I bet a jury would tie the strings all together and say Candace is guilty of libel.
82 posted on
01/16/2026 4:54:31 PM PST by
cgbg
("Your identity is how power treats you.")
To: cgbg
I would love to see a “Better Call Saul” junkyard dog libel plaintiff attorney rip into her in court. I bet a jury would tie the strings all together and say Candace is guilty of libel.
From what I have seen, the lawyer would lose. Saying "Person A has close ties to person B, who is a known associate of person C, who is a convicted pedophile and part of an organization which currently caters to abused children" could not be considered slander of person A, even if the implication is that person A has some involvement. Of course, I'm not a lawyer or any other part of our crooked legal system.
Aside from the loudmouths who have a political axe to grind, there seem to be people who cannot stand even the slightest implication that TPUSA is anything but a pure, godly organization. I think Kirk was a good man, but they murdered him, and under TPUSA's watch. I think Candace's investigations have shown enough evidence that TPUSA or a few of its key members are dirty, and a lot of people cannot tolerate that. They wish to stay in their crafted bubble. Worse yet is the implication that TPUSA may have been a propaganda puppet for larger groups.
My axiom is that, any time very large quantities of money are involved, dirty people are going to come out of the woodwork, and when someone or something has high propaganda value, a different kind of dirty people is going to come out of the woodwork. When you have both, well...
84 posted on
01/16/2026 5:28:30 PM PST by
fr_freak
(So foul a sky clears not without a storm.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson