It’s a distinction without a difference. Older methods of screening many candidate drug chemistries versus AI-enhanced screening at a far faster rate and more rapid market introduction. I just don’t get what bugs you about that. Did you also complain about steam-powered looms in England in your early years?
It is not the rate of discovery but the temptation to fraudulently pass and sell drug candidates in order to preserve the business case for AI.
Which I already spelled out before your attempt to gaslight me into saying I had totally different UNSPOKEN motives.
Quit trolling.