In this kind of situation, I think the side that gets the injunction is supposed to have a fund that would pay all the associated costs if they end up losing the case/appeals.
That’s why Trump had to fork over so much money for Tish James’s lawfare. It was supposed to be in case he lost the case.
I’m not a lawyer, so maybe some lawyers can weigh in.
i think that is how the ACLU operates too- they use taxpayer money to launch myriad cort cases, then the loser has ot pay the court fees of the winner- or soemthing like that- since most of the cases result in the defendant not having hte money to continue the case- the defendant end up having to pay the court fees and drops out of the case if i remember right
i dont understand it lal- maybe i got facts mixed up- but here’s a law site explaining it
“The Supreme Court Has Ruled: Losers Must Pay!”
https://jalsovszky.com/blog/en/the-supreme-court-has-ruled-losers-must-pay