To: xkaydet65
It’s unconstitutional. It’s negating the votes of voters who voted for the guy who won the stateThere is nothing in the Federal constitution about "voting for President" or "winning a state".
The President is chosen by 538 voters, appointed by 50 State Legislatures (+3 by Congress), using whatever method seems wise to them.
7 posted on
12/17/2025 10:51:44 AM PST by
Jim Noble
To: Jim Noble
Article IV, Section 4:
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Governmen”
I would argue that any state that allows other states to determine its electors is not “Republican”. The same would go if the state chose or directed electors based on a Ouija Board, an AI model, or even the governor’s choice. The states have a wide berth in method of selection, but it still must be republican in orientation.
10 posted on
12/17/2025 11:05:23 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
To: Jim Noble
POPULATION OF NYC ALONE=== OVER 8,478,000
TOTAL STATE OF WYOMING=== 587,618
NYC BY ITSELF == 14 TIMES THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF WYOMING
THIS WILL LEAD TO ALL NATIONAL ELECTIONS BEING WON BY LARGE CITIES.
12 posted on
12/17/2025 11:26:48 AM PST by
ridesthemiles
(not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: Jim Noble
But there is about denying voters their votes. If you clain the winner to be the person with the fewesr votes you have denied people their voting rights. Like it or not Presidents are not voted on by states. Electors are.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson