Posted on 12/16/2025 7:34:33 AM PST by Miami Rebel
President Donald Trump’s chief of staff Susie Wiles offered a remarkably candid window into a presidency she described, repeatedly, as driven by impulse and a widening view of executive power, in a blockbuster Vanity Fair portrait built around months of exclusive on-the-record conversations.
Wiles may be the most powerful figure in Trump’s West Wing besides Trump himself, but her role is exercised less as a brake than as a gearbox, translating the president’s instinct into policy, and urging everyone else to fall into line.
“I’m not an enabler. I’m also not a bitch,” Wiles said. “I guess time will tell whether I’ve been effective.”
Throughout the two-part article, Wiles was unusually free with labels for the people closest to Trump. Vice President JD Vance’s political transformation from calling Trump “Hitler” to becoming his partner, she said, has been “sort of political,” as she jibed he’s been “a conspiracy theorist for a decade.”
Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought, Project 2025 co-author and architect behind many civil service cuts, was branded “a right-wing absolute zealot.” Former First Buddy Elon Musk, she said, was “a complete solo actor” and an “avowed ketamine” user, an “odd duck” whose early scorched-earth DOGE cuts to USAID she admitted left her “aghast.” Meanwhile, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was hit with “quirky Bobby,” although she defended his changes to Health and Human Services. Having been instrumental to their selection, however, she complimented the team as “a world-class Cabinet, better than anything I could have conceived of.”
The president himself was not spared the sharp analysis either.
Wiles told Vanity Fair she sees Trump through the lens of her father, the late Pat Summerall, whom she described as an absentee parent and an alcoholic. She said that experience left her “a little bit of an expert in big personalities.”
Her verdict on the president is brutal and brief, that Trump “has an alcoholic’s personality.” She said he “operates [with] a view that there’s nothing he can’t do. Nothing, zero, nothing.”
While she did not deny any of the quotes attributed to her, Wiles lashed out via X hours after publication on Tuesday, arguing the articles was “a disingenuously framed hit piece” designed to make the administration look bad in which “significant context was disregarded.”
The article frames her comments against major policy efforts, which lays out a second-term sequence that often begins with brief internal dissent to Trump’s broad edicts, then total institutional alignment.
She admitted that DOGE’s wrecking ball approach to USAID, shutting the agency down first before dismantling programs, was her first crisis and that despite Trump’s order to spare some essential programs, Musk pushed forward. She clashed with Musk on the issue, she said, but admitted when it came to implementation, the president was unaware of the cleanup.
“The president doesn’t know and never will,” she said. “He doesn’t know the details of these smallish agencies.”
Perhaps the sharpest example of Wiles’s limits is a recounting of the administration’s approach to January 6. On day one, Trump issued pardons to almost everyone convicted over the Capitol attack, including violent offenders. Wiles told Vanity Fair that she raised objections at the time, asking whether Trump really wanted to pardon them all.
“I did exactly that,” Wiles replied. “I said, ‘I am on board with the people that were happenstancers or didn’t do anything violent. And we certainly know what everybody did because the FBI has done such an incredible job.’ ”
But Wiles told the outlet Trump insisted the offenders had been treated unfairly and she ultimately moved with him and “sort of got on board.”
“There have been a couple of times where I’ve been outvoted,” Wiles said, equal parts shrug and confession. “And if there’s a tie, he wins.”
Likewise, on tariffs, she described “huge disagreement” internally before insisting the team fall in line with Trump’s instincts.
Of the rollout, she mused it was all a form of “thinking out loud” before explaining how she told staff to get behind it.
“I said, ‘This is where we’re going to end up. So figure out how you can work into what he’s already thinking.’ Well, they couldn’t get there.”
“It’s been more painful than I expected,” Wiles relayed.
On immigration, Wiles admitted process failures – “I will concede that we’ve got to look harder at our process for deportation” – and urged caution: “But if there is a question, I think our process has to lean toward a double-check.”
Yet she was also unable to explain high-profile cases that Vanity Fair’s Chris Whipple confronted her on, including U.S. citizen children deported with their mothers, including one small child with cancer.
“It could be an overzealous Border Patrol agent, I don’t know,” she said. “I can’t understand how you make that mistake, but somebody did.”
Throughout the piece in conversation with Vanity Fair, Wiles lays out a second term governed by a president following instincts then enforced by loyalists where the consequences are absorbed by institutions and above all by her, the woman trying to “facilitate his vision” while insisting she’s not there to enable it.
I understand exactly why Susie has this opinion, because it’s true. He does have behavioral similarities with long term alcoholics. Broad, unpredictable and intense mood swings, picking targets of the moment, are just two common characteristics. I’m not complaining, b/c he’s getting a lot of good work done. I am only making observations.
The big mistake is her saying all that in enemy territory. Usually, a Chief of Staff would be disciplined enough to at very least, WAIT until the end of your Boss’ term, then, perhaps 3 or 4 years later, then you come out with your tattletale, blabbermouth books to feather your retirement nests. She just could not wait to start running her mouth. Susie must be deeply unhappy or dissatisfied at her job to be chopping down her own tree, so to speak.
Very common practice, particularly in rural areas where the "Dumpers" assume that the "Dumpees" will adopt them!
“a conspiracy theorist for a decade.”
Some conspiracies actually exist. Some do not. Russian collusion clearly was a conspiracy. Candace Owens comments about Erika Kirk, TPUSA clearly no basis in fact.
Every football team has a playbook and runs a conspiracy that the other team can only guess at. Every business with competitors has a business plan with elements, trade secrets they do not want their competitors to know.
If Vance believes in conspiracies grounded in fact, great. If Vance believes in hallucinations then not so great.
“She also opposed tariffs.”
Tariffs are a fringe element within the MAGA coalition. But every 2% or 3% was needed to build a winning coalition. The point is that she has her own opinions and expresses them. But when the decision is made, she goes with the decision.
This is good teamwork. The wide receiver thinks that every play should be a pass to the wide receiver. But when the decision is for the halfback to run around his end, he is a team player.
Whether grounded in fact or in hallucination, it was bizarre for Wiles to publicly ruminate about them.
Seems like she knows Trump is nearly a vegetable at this point, and she’s positioning herself as a caretaker once he is gone with the Alzheimers he’s being treated for. It’s likely the cabinet would not sit still for a Vance presidency, so she makes some sense as the most competent player in a gang of misfits toadies and incompetents.
She’s saying it in public because she is establishing herself as a reasonable alternative to the clearly unstable Vance once Trump fully gives out.
LOOSE_CANNON_PING!
“Conspiracy” is in the criminal statutes of almost every country in the world for a reason.
“Conspiracy” is not a crime. “Conspiracy to commit a crime” might be a crime. But conspiracy to throw you a birthday party, for to beat the opposing team in football is not a crime.
Yes, bizzare for Wiles to say this. Not bizarre for a high school sophmore to say it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.