Posted on 12/10/2025 8:50:08 AM PST by bluescape
Would some of you give me an opinion of Candice Owens? I know we have some loose cannons on the right. I feel like overall we have healthy disagreements that are based on honest differences compared to libs that line up perfectly for the strict purpose of power.
Steven Crowder had Nick Fuentes on and asked him straight questions about some controversies and the exchange was refreshing. Not a gotcha interview but an informative one.
Lots of decent conservative shows like Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Micheal Knowles invite other conservatives to discuss their issues so that they can argue openly and honestly. That helps me understand some of the BS from the left. Other folks I just haven't kept up with but I hear some strange quotes from them.
If they're crazy, fine. We can disagree on what's sane. We're not libs that twist and blur the truth for power..,Mostly. But we have some disappointing apples in our ranks and we should hold them accountable.
Is Candice Owens crazy dishonest or just a strange flip flopper?
Candace is splitting MAGA. Anyone who thinks that people other than Ro inson and his circle are guilty is nuts.
She does seem to be losing it and all the money she’s making it going to go fast. You’re right she’s not stable and her husband is probably at the very least embarrassed in front of his peers and wondering what he did to ruin his life like this.
I see. You wanted "ideas", not opinions.
Because Oprah and co tow the line. I love people who talk out of turn, and against the trend!
But she showed the texts from Charlie Kirk.
But Clinton had very strong and obvious motivation to lie.
Not “the US military.”
Just like “the US military” didn’t have a hand in multiple false flags over the decades.
But rogue individuals in the military did.
See how clear thinking works?
But Owens showed us Charlie Kirk’s texts.
The texts included Charlie’s statement that he wanted to change his position on Israel. Right before he was killed.
And then the Turning Point people lied about it, and then they tried to obscure it.
But Turning Point backed out on interviewing Candace, like they were afraid.
TPUSA insisted on an in-person appearance. Candace had already offered anytime anywhere condition and they took her up on it.
She later added conditions, because it would be favorable for her.
Sorry, that’s not backing out.
Texts provided by Candace are not evidence of any credible kind for the insinuation that Israel had some hand in the death of Charlie Kirk.
“The texts included Charlie’s statement that he wanted to change his position on Israel. Right before he was killed.”
They indicated frustration and Charlie did say in public that he was concerned the fight was going too far into Gaza. But he didn’t waver on supporting Israel’s right to exist and defend itself.
BUT! BUT! What sort of shithead believes Israel murdered Charlie Kirk, or TPUSA did? Are you ballistically stupid? Israel does not run around murdering US citizens. Nor does the US government obey Israel.
IT IS THE OTHER WAY AROUND! When the US cracks the whip, it is ISRAEL that backs down - even when they believe it is dangerous for them!
And TPUSA? YGBSM! You think Erica and his closest friends murdered him? You think the trial starting now is all a scam? Based on “I don’t know know, but I know...trust me, I’m Charlie’s lover girl!”
You mean when you tried to split MAGA right there?
The only people I’ve seen accusing Israel of murdering Charlie Kirk are you and some of the people at Turning point.
Owens hasn’t made this accusation.
Meanwhile, why are you trying to hide the Charlie Kirk text? Yes, I will bring it out here if needed.
“Texts provided by Candace are not evidence of any credible kind for the insinuation that Israel had some hand in the death of Charlie Kirk.”
Of course they’re not evidence for accusing Israel of assassinating Charlie Kirk.
But they are evidence that Charlie wanted to change his position on Israel.
And Turning Point is doing their best to hide this fact.
You mean when Turning Point invited Candace to appear, and told her “you have 24 hours to respond,” and when she said that was too soon they cancelled?
Looks like they were trying to figure out a way to avoid having to talk to her in public.
This is so obvious, and pathetic. And low IQ, I should add.
She has blamed Israel for just about everything. YOU wrote “ The texts included Charlie’s statement that he wanted to change his position on Israel. Right before he was killed.” THAT implies Israel was involved!
I don’t care if you post a couple of texts Kirk wrote while angry. SO WHAT? Totally meaningless UNLESS you are blaming the JOOS for killing Kirk.
Dammit we KNOW who killed Charlie. He was in court today. But you and Candy “I hate the Jews” Owen’s are trying to get him off. Probably because Candy can’t handle Charlie loving ERICA instead of her!
“THAT implies Israel was involved!”
But why would you accuse Charlie Kirk of implying Israel was involved?
Your emotions have invaded your ability to think straight.
Candace Owens stated that she was given a two-week notice to plan for the December 15 livestream event. Hardly 24 hrs
What you’re telling me is that if I don’t surrender my independent thinking, then I’m an anti-Semite?
I’d say this makes you an anti-Semite!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.