How am I faulting him?
I’m only saying he’s at fault IF he exists. So it’s presenting the argument to those who believe he exists and has the qualities and abilities they claim he has
So yes, you can’t assign a fault to someone who doesn’t exist.
But if you believe he exists then the objections I present apply to you.
Does that make sense?
Thanks, I thought you thought that.
The underlying question I have is, “Why are you wasting time in a RELIGION forum, if you have no dog in the fight.”