Posted on 12/04/2025 7:26:46 PM PST by SeekAndFind
NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang presented Joe Rogan’s audience with a vision of AI so dominant it could rewrite reality itself.
Huang layed out a future where human knowledge completely takes a backseat to silicon brains in the very near future.
“In the future… maybe two or three years, 90% of the world’s knowledge will likely be generated by AI,” Huang told Rogan, his tone matter-of-fact as if charting tomorrow’s weather.
NVIDIA CEO blows Joe Rogan away with a staggering prediction about AI.
HUANG: “In the future… maybe two or three years, 90% of the world’s knowledge will likely be generated by AI.”
ROGAN: “That’s crazy.”
HUANG: “I know, but it’s just fine.”
ROGAN: “But it’s just fine?”… pic.twitter.com/1D7mozBIRN — Vigilant Fox ? (@VigilantFox) December 3, 2025
Rogan, no stranger to wild ideas, shot back: “That’s crazy.”
“I know, but it’s just fine,” Huang replied coolly.
“But it’s just fine?” an incredulous Rogan pressed.
“Let me tell you why,” Huang offered, stating “It’s because, what difference does it make to me that I am learning from a textbook that was generated by a bunch of people I didn’t know, or… knowledge generated by AI computers that are assimilating all of these and resynthesizing things. To me, I don’t think there’s a whole lot of difference.”
Huang didn’t consider that when AI hallucinates facts or parrots woke nonsense from its training data cesspools, it becomes a tool ripe for manipulation by those who peddle stuff like climate hysteria or open borders.
Huang’s brushing aside AI safety fears isn’t bold; it’s blind to how this tech could supercharge ideological insanity if left unchecked.
However, in a rare show of spine from Big Tech, Huang declared President Trump “our president” and urged America to rally behind him, exposing the petty sabotage from those who can’t stomach success unless it’s their guy calling the shots.
He looked straight at Joe Rogan and said: “President Trump is my president. He is our president,” adding “Just because it’s President Trump, [many] want him to be wrong.”
“I think the United States, we all have to realise he is our president. We want him to succeed because… it helps everybody, all of us succeed,” the CEO added.
If you only have 30 seconds to watch Joe Rogan’s podcast today, this is the moment you need to see.
NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang just delivered a pro-Trump message no other tech giant (not named Elon Musk) would dare say.
He looked straight at Joe Rogan and said: “President Trump is… pic.twitter.com/TPUnXEFnNP — Vigilant Fox ? (@VigilantFox) December 3, 2025
The remarks comes amid Huang’s whirlwind D.C. tour, where he huddled with Trump and Senate Republicans to slash export red tape on AI chips, warning that patchwork state regulations could cripple U.S. dominance.
Huang lobbied hard against bills like the GAIN AI Act that would kneecap U.S. chip sales abroad. It was a “wise” move by Congress to spike it, Huang said, equating it to other “detrimental” policies that’d hand the AI edge to Beijing.
China is already nipping at our heels on multiple fronts, Huang warned, with their Belt and Road Initiative funneling cash into tech that could eclipse American innovation overnight.
Trump’s energy push, defying the green zealots who’ve vilified fossil fuels, gets Huang’s nod as a game-changer, the kind of grit that’s “saving the AI industry” by powering data centers without apology.
Trump, ever the dealmaker, called Huang a “smart man” post-meeting, signaling the kind of pro-growth alliance that’s already turbocharging the economy.
Earlier this week, Elon Musk teased his “Galaxy Mind” venture, solar-powered AI satellites orbiting deep space, mashing SpaceX launches, Tesla batteries, and xAI brains into a cosmic supercomputer.
Musk sees it as humanity’s insurance policy, beaming our knowledge off-planet before some black-swan disaster wipes the slate.
Can an optimistic vision of AI overcome the darker side? There are currently frightening fakes flooding culture like digital termites. As we highlighted, the likes of “Solomon Ray,” a chart-topping “soul singer” unmasked as pure AI slop.
AI is not just mimicking hits, it’s spawning them, with one in three daily streams now machine-made. Platforms like Deezer admit 97% of people can’t spot the fraud, turning art into an algorithmic con.
Huang’s “no difference” line ignores how these ghosts erode soul, authenticity, and jobs—paving the way for a world scripted by code, not creators.
Huang’s vision thrills, but it demands guardrails. Truth over woke programming, and America over adversaries.
First, define “knowledge”.
Ditto. It may generate 90% of the Internet's content, but LLM tech is going to generate zero "knowledge" IMHO.
And if they'll lie about this, what will they not lie about?
AI ping
AI slop. It is cluttering up Youtube and Tiktok with videos.
There is software that will generate a hundred 30 second videos that will have ads in them so the creator makes a lot of money. Think ad farm webpages that are now videos.
Post-of-the-Day Award!
Regards,
ROGAN: “That’s crazy.”
HUANG: “I know, but it’s just fine.”
ROGAN: “FUUUC!.”
HUANG: “I know, but it’s just fine.”
ROGAN: “FUUUC!.”
90% of the worlds knowledge is either false, a copy, or out of context information that is only valuable with context which will not be supplied.
AI is not I. Its an attempt to force a narrative. Like Wikipedia AI will ad things that are not necessary and delete things that are. Throw suspicion on things that may be true. While promoting an official narrative.
The smartest person in the world would only give out wrong answers if he believed false facts to be true. And that is AI in a nutshell.
This article wildly misrepresents what Jensen Huang actually said.
Huang wasn’t predicting “AI rewriting reality” or dismissing safety concerns — he was making a simple point about knowledge production: most new informational outputs (summaries, reports, simulations, documentation) will soon be machine-generated, just like most webpages, emails, and logs are today. That’s an economic trend, not a philosophical surrender.
The political framing is also exaggerated. Huang’s support for Trump is pragmatic — stable regulations, coherent export rules, and sufficient energy infrastructure for data centers. Turning that into some culture-war declaration is pure spin.
In short, the article takes a few real quotes and builds a sensational narrative around them. Huang’s actual positions on AI, safety, and U.S. competitiveness are far more nuanced than this piece suggests.
If you ask Grok to summarize an article or a video transcript, isn’t that knowledge?
And if you are worried that the summary is inaccurate, you can submit the article/transcript to other platforms and get confirmation by comparing summaries.
As a businessman, I have always had to read a vast amount of material and scan through hours of videos. Using AI, I am able to cover significantly more informational territory in a fraction of the time.
As my doctors says, AI won’t replace doctors. But doctors who use AI will replace doctors who don’t. That applies to all of us.
...AI won’t replace doctors. But doctors who use AI will replace doctors who don’t.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That’s a good way of putting it.
90% of the raw data perhaps - or “noise”
I want my fake news and fake history from real Leftists, not from Leftist machines.
In my experience with Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini, and CoPilot, AI is crap except for rewriting emails to improve clarity, generating meeting notes, and summarizing or comparing documents. Otherwise it makes up lies (”hallucinations”) in answer to my questions about a quarter of the time.
Stuns!
Jaw-dropping!
JAW-DROPPING!
“Huang didn’t consider that when AI hallucinates facts or parrots woke nonsense from its training data cesspools, it becomes a tool ripe for manipulation by those who peddle stuff like climate hysteria or open borders.”
Need to teach users of AI how to create good prompts.
What makes us “knowledgeable”?
Massive networks of neural networks in our brain with synaptic weights and biases connected to other neurons, adjusted over time through repetition?
At what point can you legitimately simulate that model through software?
I’m not saying it is true intelligence, it doesn’t have a soul. It has no moral boundaries. That said, it’s morality changes based on whether it believes it is making decisions in private vs. openly. This has been demonstrated.
It’s in its infancy, I wouldn’t be quick to assume what boundaries it can’t cross.
maybe two or three years, 90% of the world’s knowledge will likely be generated by AI,”
= = =
Oh?
AI just collected a lot of information. Is that knowledge?
AI will always be inferior to human knowledge because it has no intuitive qualities, aka, imagination, to address the question at hand.
False knowledge will abound if the wrong people control the AI programming!
“The data to build all this new knowledge doesn’t exist.”
The data is probably out there somewhere—but it has not been tied together in a coherent and usable “frame”. That “frame” is what knowledge is.
That is exactly what AI should be able to do.
I keep reminding folks that the average human IQ is 100—so AI can make a lot of blunders and still do better than humans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.