New York Times op-ed writer slams whites: 'You lost;' 'Your culture sucks'

American Thinker ^ | 2 Dec, 2025 | Selwyn Duke

[MtnClimber]

America has given this third-world goober and his family everything -- and he can't stand it.

Reacting to invasion (im)migration trends years ago, Ambassador Alan Keyes put it bluntly.

“We’re being colonized,” he said.

And if ever there was proof of this, and the low quality of many post-1965 newcomers — and of the lie of “diversity” — it’s a viral video posted by one Wajahat Ali.

Mr. Ali is a Pakistani-descent Muslim whose parents came to the U.S. in 1965 and lived the American dream — and an un-American scheme. That is, they served prison time in the mid-2000s for conspiracy, mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering for defrauding Microsoft out of millions of dollars.

Some say Ali weaponized this experience, playing the victim.

What’s for sure is that it didn’t stop him from becoming a Daily Beast columnist and New York Times op-ed writer. And that status didn’t stop him from something else:

He went on a bigoted anti-white tirade on social media in which he made clear that he’s an enemy within who hates the Western people who founded our country. As he said in his video, which is making the rounds:

You have lost. You lost. The mistake that you made is, you let us in in the first place. It has to do with brown people, and I am going to say this as a brown person:

There’s a lot of us—like, a lot. There is like 1.2 billion in India, there is more than 200 million in Pakistan, and there’s like 170 million in Bangladesh. Those are just the people there; I ain’t even talking about the folks who are expats or immigrants. There’s a bunch of us — and we breed. We’re a breeding people, and the problem is

[Tommy Revolts]

There’s a lot of us—like, a lot.

There's your first big problem, you all hate each other. Lol.

[KittyKares]

It sounds like the Trump administration is going to kick a bunch out.

[rlmorel]

The immigration policy in place before he took office is the China Shop, no pun intended.

[Mr. K]

You don’t recognize the concept of a rhetorical question do you?

[Chickensoup]

You don’t recognize the concept of a rhetorical answer do you?

[Mr. K]

There is no such thing, and plus you’re ugly

[Chickensoup]

I may be ugly. But you are mean and stupid.

A rhetorical answer is a response given to a rhetorical question or an unasked question, intended to make a point, produce an effect, or emphasize a statement rather than to provide a literal or factual reply.
It is often used to guide the audience’s thinking, challenge their assumptions, or provoke thought without expecting a direct answer.
For example, if someone asks, “Do you know how many people will be in our philosophy class this year?” and the response is “42,” the answer is not meant to be taken literally but to serve as a rhetorical device to make a point or create a humorous or emphatic effect.

Rhetorical answers can be used in various contexts, such as persuasive writing, public speaking, or casual conversation, to assert a position, express frustration, or highlight an obvious truth.
They are often employed to create a dramatic impact or to underscore a sentiment, such as in the case of a sarcastic response like “Who knew?” when discussing a well-known fact.
In some instances, a rhetorical answer may be given in response to a question that is not actually being asked but is anticipated by the participants in a conversation.

These answers are not meant to be questioned or debated, as they are designed to convey a pre-existing opinion or belief.
They are a form of assertion disguised as a question, relying on the shared understanding between speaker and listener that the answer is obvious or implied.
The effectiveness of a rhetorical answer lies in its ability to engage the audience, reinforce a message, or add emphasis without requiring a formal response.

[Mr. K]

No im not