Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Miami Rebel
In their glee to punch Trump, I didn't see that the NYT wrote why she's not eligible. I didn't, and won't, click into a NYT story.
45 posted on 12/01/2025 8:53:32 AM PST by libertylover (The HBM (Has Been Media) is almost all AGENDA-DRIVEN and HATE-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: libertylover

The Times DID summarize:

In its ruling, the three-judge panel, based in Philadelphia, affirmed an earlier ruling by a Federal District Court judge, shooting down each of the government’s arguments for why Ms. Habba could continue to serve.

In their opinion, the judges wrote that the Trump administration appeared to have become frustrated by the legal and political barriers that have prevented its preferred U.S. attorneys from leading federal prosecutors’ offices. They added that the maneuvers undertaken to keep Ms. Habba in charge exemplified the difficulties it had faced.

“Yet the citizens of New Jersey and the loyal employees in the U.S. attorney’s office deserve some clarity and stability,” the judges wrote.


46 posted on 12/01/2025 8:59:41 AM PST by Miami Rebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: libertylover

Here’s the court’s opinion (written by Judge Fisher):

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/26313458/habbaopn120125.pdf


47 posted on 12/01/2025 9:01:29 AM PST by Miami Rebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson