With all due respect, many here have refuted your arguments about sixteen posts ago. Your answer has been to cite Grok and CNN.
And now, to change the facts, you are asserting that the Grand Nury voted all the counts down. So now the foreperson is lying?
Amendment- you have cited CNN, Grok (with a loaded query) and Twitter.
I am sorting through this. I posted the update from another lawyer after DOJ decided to refute what Lemons said.
And there is an issue of timing
““The short time span between the moment the prosecutor learned that the grand jury rejected one count in the original indictment and the time the prosecutor appeared in court to return the second indictment could not have been sufficient to draft the second indictment, sign the second indictment, present it to the grand jury, provide legal instructions to the grand jury, and give them an opportunity to deliberate and render a decision on the new indictment,” Fitzpatrick wrote.”
So exactly how are you defending the timing issue?? And exactly what was presented?