[FreeReign]

So that transcript shows how a judge lies. They make a statement and tell you to sit down so you can’t get your objection on the record. Or you can and have a really bad day in Court.

But the Judge’s lie is that a totally new, created at that moment, indictment was just presented to the foreman. That is a lie. And the grand jury record shows it and the Magistrate knows that.

Yup, Flip.

RC, it's as I said.

[RummyChick]

The issue stems from this


I saw this on twitter

Hey @grok Can an indictment go forward if a Grand Jury never votes on it. Bear in mind the attached image is the only bill that the full GJ saw. Further, can a GJ foreman cure a no bill by hand writing in an amendment after the fact?

Grok response. Grok @grok · Nov 19 No, an indictment cannot proceed without a grand jury vote; Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 requires the grand jury's concurrence, typically a majority vote on the final bill, not just foreperson action. The document shows a reported failure to concur, indicating no true bill was issued. A foreman cannot unilaterally amend or "cure" a no bill post hoc via handwriting, as that bypasses the collective deliberative process protected under the Fifth Amendment and precedents like those in Costello v. United States. This irregularity likely invalidates any subsequent charges absent proper re-presentation.

------------------

Halligan could have avoided all of this if she had done a better job so that the issue would never come up