Then why did Tyler Lemons say this
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5616816-comey-grand-jury-doj/
“Asked directly by U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff whether the final indictment is a document that was “never shown” to the entire grand jury, Lemons said he wasn’t there but “yes, that is my understanding.”
Shouldn’t he know his case?????????????????????????????
Halligan and Lemons are in over their head. They are up against experienced lawyers and an adversarial Judge.
Chances are Comey walks.
“Chances are Comey walks.”
And? He was walking regardless in that venue and we all knew it. So why on a motion to dismiss? Because the facts that were coming out, Comey walking or not, were absolutely damaging. Handwritten notes found in a burn bag?!?!
Oh, I appreciate you posting the transcripts. Having read a zillion of these things over the years, I just don’t read them as you.
Halligan did not admit to what the Judge and press say she did. She did not admit to never presenting the indictments to the Grand Jury. And the other prosecutor wasn’t there, had no direct knowledge and instead of saying that put his thumb on the scale.