Posted on 11/21/2025 4:19:45 AM PST by MtnClimber
Jasmine Crockett calls out Republicans for accepting donations from a “Jeffrey Epstein” — but it was a complelety different person than the pedophile Democrat donor we all know and loathe.
Someone in Rep. Crockett’s staff got this one seriously wrong—I assume that it was her staff because she told us that “they” found the reference to Epstein contributing to GOP campaigns. Here is the story:
Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett was called out for dropping the names of a series of Republicans who took donations from Jeffrey Epstein, but she got the wrong Jeffrey Epstein.
The Texas lawmaker and rising star of the Democratic Party was speaking on the House floor on Tuesday when she commented.
‘Folks who also took money from somebody named Jeffrey Epstein, as I had my team dig in very quickly: Mitt Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zeldin, George Bush, Win Red, McCain-Palin, Rick Lazio,’ Crockett stated.
Her remarks came as the House was considering the censure of Del. Stacey Plaskett for texting with the disgraced financier.
‘If this is the standard that we’re going to make, just know we’re going to expose it all and just know that the FEC filings, they are available for everybody to review,’ she added.
Yes, this information is available for everybody to review. Nevertheless, your staff, or whoever wrote that speech, should have been smart enough to go beyond “googling” a name of a person who contributed to a GOP campaign. Did someone in her staff ask: “Are you sure he is the same one? Shouldn’t we check that before we have our boss go out and make a fool of herself?” Clearly, there’s more than one Jeffrey Epstein in the world.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Was that before or after his death?
Some, but not all, were from after his death.
This is much worse that portrayed. In her ignorance, she chose to adopt the Epstein reference and attempt to exonerate herself by saying she only referred to “a Jeffrey Epstein” not “the Jeffrey Epstein” and knew that it was not one and the same. Thereby admitting that she attempted to defraud the public and her colleagues would would not know that difference.
Very dark.
That loudmouth ho should be censured by Congress. But as a member of a protected class she won’t be.
Staff might have dangled the Epstein connection with attached warnings that corroboration was needed, but she took the bait and ran with it (as we all know, she's very impulsive).
When she screams at them, they can say, "Well, we warned you we needed to check it carefully, but you decided to run with it as is."
Somebody once talked about “the soft bigotry of lowered expectations”. Jasmine Crockett appears to be the poster child for that.
Bkmk
Who imagines that Jasmine Crockett is a ‘rising star” after the statements she’s been known to make? I sure wouldn’t want her in a position of any importance. She might be OK for dog catcher.
Disagree
I love dogs
Don’t need her mistreating them.
“OK for dog catcher”
Hell no! Man’s best friend? The bitch would just sell them to dog fighters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.