[dpetty121263]

Just the Federal stamp of approval on sanctioning mass layoffs.

[one guy in new jersey]

AI power and water needs can’t be allowed to burden the American people unduly. Displacing the needs of actual people or pricing ordinary people out.

[Jim W N]

Uh, constitutionally, the Legislative Branch, Congress, makes the laws, not the Executive Branch.

Hello?

[vivenne]

NO.

[Leaning Right]

The President’s most important job is ensuring national security.

But this AI thing does not seem to be a grave threat to national security.
Therefore, the 10th Amendment should apply.

[plain talk]

OK but shouldn’t the same idea be applied to automobile and other product standards?

Since that’s not happening I would be surprised if this holds up either.

[Carry_Okie]

Yet the plan likely violates the 10th Amendment, which reserves core regulatory and police powers to the states.

Oddly to some, there is a counter argument here: The principal original purpose of the Commerce Clause was to prevent trade barriers among States, effectively making the US a free-trade zone. IOW AI will likely pose a series of complicated questions from a Constitutional perspective, not so easily reduced to a flippant assertion of the 10th Amendment, with Mr. Musk's ambitions going wildly beyond that.

[circlecity]

I don’t like this. A big payoff to big tech. A big brother.